Skip to main content

Security report for lnm.lt

Lietuvos nacionalinis muziejus · Government · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lietuvos nacionalinis muziejus is a prominent Lithuanian national museum, preserving over 1.5 million exhibits and operating across eleven branches. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for exhibitions, events, and educational activities, targeting the general public and cultural enthusiasts. The institution holds a significant position in Lithuania's cultural landscape, offering rich content and services aligned with its mission. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and WooCommerce plugin, indicating a mature digital infrastructure capable of supporting e-commerce and content management. Integration of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel reflects a modern approach to analytics and marketing. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although accessibility features could be enhanced. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs standard security headers, contributing to a solid security posture. However, the absence of explicit incident response policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in security transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence for the Lithuanian National Museum, with moderate risk due to unavailable WHOIS data and minor gaps in security policy disclosures. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and accessibility would further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lnm.lt

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Lithuanian National Museum operates as a government cultural institution with a focus on heritage preservation, public education, and cultural events. Its market positioning is strong within Lithuania, serving a broad audience including tourists, educators, and researchers. The business model centers on public service rather than commercial profit, with potential revenue streams from ticket sales and merchandise via WooCommerce. The museum's digital presence supports its mission by providing accessible information and engagement opportunities. Partnerships with cultural and educational organizations are implied but not explicitly detailed on the site. Growth indicators include active event programming and digital content updates. The museum maintains a consistent brand and leverages modern web technologies to enhance user experience.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools is balanced with privacy compliance measures. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure channel limits transparency and may hinder rapid response to security incidents. Contact information for a Data Protection Officer is provided, indicating awareness of data protection responsibilities. The site would benefit from implementing CAPTCHA on forms to reduce spam and potential abuse. Regular updates and monitoring of WordPress and plugins are essential to maintain security integrity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement CAPTCHA or other anti-bot protections on all public forms to mitigate spam and abuse.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and stakeholders.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with recognized standards and improve user inclusivity.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update all CMS components promptly to address emerging vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Lietuvos nacionalinis muziejus
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lietuvos nacionalinis muziejus
Description
Lietuvos nacionalinis muziejus – vienas pirmųjų muziejų Lietuvoje. Šiandien jis saugo daugiau nei 1,5 milijono eksponatų ir vienija vienuolika padalinių, kuriuose vyksta parodos, renginiai, edukacijos.
Key services
Museum exhibitions, Cultural events, Educational programs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, YouTube iframe API, FontAwesome, Avada Theme
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Avada
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CAPTCHA not detected but contact forms present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed national museum site with rich content in Lithuanian.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with Avada theme and WooCommerce plugin (likely for ticketing or merchandise).
  3. Includes comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or domain age info.
  5. No signs of WAF or blocking; site content fully accessible.
  6. Includes multiple tracking and marketing scripts (Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel).
  7. Contact information and data protection officer details are present.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with the Avada theme and WooCommerce plugin, indicating a flexible and widely supported platform. It uses jQuery and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs such as jsdelivr and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and mobile responsiveness. Accessibility is basic, suggesting potential technical debt in inclusive design. The absence of hosting provider information limits infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical stack is modern and capable but would benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lnm.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lnm.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.