Skip to main content

Security report for lmda.lv

LMDA · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LMDA is a Latvian dance association website focused on organizing and managing dance competitions, licensing dance studios, trainers, judges, and supervisors, and publishing competition results and rules. The site targets dance competitors, studios, and officials primarily in Latvia. The business model appears to be non-commercial or association-based, serving a niche community with downloadable results and licensing information. Technically, the website is basic, using static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS. It lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is weak, with no HTTPS enforcement or security headers detected, and no privacy or cookie policies present. Contact information and social media presence are absent, limiting business credibility and user engagement. Overall, the site is functional but dated and requires modernization and security improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lmda.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lmda.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lmda.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves a niche market of dance professionals and enthusiasts in Latvia, providing essential services such as competition calendars, results, and licensing. It maintains partnerships with several dance studios and related organizations, as evidenced by multiple external links. The business operates likely as a small association founded in 2007, with limited digital maturity and no evident revenue streams or e-commerce capabilities. The lack of contact details and privacy policies suggests limited focus on broader commercial or regulatory compliance. Growth potential may depend on digital modernization and enhanced user engagement.

Security posture

The security posture is minimal with no HTTPS detected in the provided data, absence of security headers, and no visible forms or input validation mechanisms. There is no evidence of privacy or cookie policies, GDPR compliance, or incident response contacts. These gaps expose the site to risks such as data interception, lack of user trust, and regulatory non-compliance. The absence of analytics or tracking reduces privacy concerns but also limits security monitoring capabilities. Overall, the site requires urgent implementation of HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance measures to improve security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Develop and publish privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Add clear contact information including official emails and phone numbers for business credibility.
  5. Improve website design for mobile responsiveness and accessibility to broaden audience reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LMDA
Description
LMDA appears to be an organization related to dance competitions, licenses, rules, and results primarily in Latvia. It provides information on competitions, licensing for studios, trainers, judges, and supervisors, as well as rules and contact information. The site offers downloadable results and rating spreadsheets for dance competitions and related events.
Key services
Dance competition calendar and results, Licensing for dance studios, trainers, judges, supervisors, Publishing rules and regulations, Providing downloadable competition results and ratings
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche Latvian dance association portal.
  2. No HTTPS or security headers detected in provided data.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  5. Content is primarily in Latvian with some English language toggle.
  6. No modern CMS or frameworks detected; site appears static and dated.
  7. Multiple external partner links to related dance studios and organizations.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No forms present for data collection.
  10. No social media links found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without use of modern frameworks or CMS platforms. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features, which limits usability on modern devices. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern web standards. The site appears hosted on an unknown provider with no visible CDN or security infrastructure. Technical debt is evident due to dated design and lack of security best practices. Modernization opportunities include adopting responsive design, CMS integration, and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lmda.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lmda.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.