Skip to main content

Security report for lmb.lv

Latvijas Mērnieku biedrība · Government · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas Mērnieku biedrība (LMB) is a professional association representing surveyors and geodesists in Latvia. The organization provides certification services, professional training courses, and represents the interests of its members within the surveying and geospatial industry. The website serves as an information hub for members and interested professionals, offering news, certification details, and contact information. The market position is that of a national professional body with a focus on industry standards and professional development. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and CookieConsent for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS with CSRF protection tokens, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, no advanced frameworks or CMS platforms are explicitly detected. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS encryption and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible advanced security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected in the provided HTML. Privacy compliance is supported by clear privacy and cookie policies in Latvian, aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with good business credibility and technical implementation. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy assessment, but the professional nature and transparency of contact information support trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response transparency would enhance the security posture further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lmb.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LMB operates as a specialized professional association within the government/non-profit sector, focusing on surveying and geodesy in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in its official certification center and role as an industry representative. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, certification fees, and training course payments. The target customers are professionals in surveying and geospatial fields. The organization maintains a focused partnership ecosystem, though no external partners are explicitly linked on the site. Growth indicators include active news updates and professional development offerings. The business model emphasizes service and certification provision rather than commercial sales.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. The presence of CSRF tokens in meta tags indicates awareness of common web security practices. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies represent compliance gaps. No direct vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The site does not provide dedicated security contact channels, which limits incident response readiness. Overall, the security culture appears basic but adequate for the organization's risk profile.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and provide dedicated incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider integrating a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Latvijas Mērnieku biedrība
Registration number
40008004744
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas Mērnieku biedrība
Description
Latvijas Mērnieku biedrība (LMB) is a professional association representing surveyors and geodesists in Latvia. It provides certification services, professional courses, and represents the interests of surveyors and geodesists in Latvia.
Key services
Certification center services, Professional courses and training, Membership services, Industry news and updates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery, CookieConsent, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • CSRF tokens present in meta tags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism implemented.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response contact information.
  5. Professional association website with relevant content and contact details.
  6. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. No forms with sensitive data collection detected in the HTML content provided.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with CSS and JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for sliders and CookieConsent for privacy management. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and analytics. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly with good SEO meta tags. No CMS or backend technologies are explicitly identified from the HTML. Performance appears moderate with no obvious bottlenecks. The site uses HTTPS with valid SSL configuration. There is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lmb.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lmb.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.