Skip to main content

Security report for llv.li

Liechtenstein National Administration · Government · Liechtenstein

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.llv.li serves as the official digital portal for the Liechtenstein National Administration, providing extensive information and services to private individuals, businesses, and government entities. It is positioned as the authoritative source for national administrative matters in Liechtenstein, offering a broad range of public service content including legal, educational, tax, and mobility information. The site targets residents, businesses, and officials within Liechtenstein, facilitating access to government resources and digital identity services such as eID.li. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, with Matomo analytics integrated for user tracking and privacy-conscious opt-out options. The content is well-structured and optimized for mobile devices, indicating a mature digital infrastructure likely managed via a CMS such as Pimcore. Performance is moderate with good accessibility and SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes some privacy-aware analytics. However, explicit privacy and cookie policies are not detected in the provided content, and security headers are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in security hardening. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published, which could be enhanced to improve trust and compliance. Overall, the website is a trustworthy and professional government portal with excellent content quality and business credibility. Strategic improvements in privacy transparency, security headers, and incident response information would further strengthen its security posture and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching llv.li

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Liechtenstein National Administration website is a key government digital asset, serving as the central hub for public administration services. Its market position is unique as the official government portal, providing comprehensive services and information to a defined national audience. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public service delivery and digital governance. The site supports multiple sectors including education, taxation, legal affairs, and digital identity management. Partnerships with related domains such as the Open Data Portal and Statistics Portal indicate a collaborative ecosystem aimed at transparency and data accessibility. Growth indicators include the integration of digital identity services and extensive content coverage. The site’s operations reflect a strategic focus on digital transformation within government services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and privacy-conscious analytics via Matomo. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, lack of visible security headers, and no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure information represent compliance gaps. These gaps could impact GDPR and NIS2 compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The security culture appears cautious but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security communication channels. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a government site but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations fully.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response contact channel, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses, to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage coordinated security communications.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update SSL/TLS configurations to ensure strong encryption and compliance with current standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Liechtenstein National Administration
Description
Official government portal providing comprehensive information and services for private individuals, businesses, and national administration in Liechtenstein.
Key services
Information on private individual services, Business-related services, National administration resources, Statistics portal, eID digital identity services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo Analytics, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by URL https://)
  • Matomo analytics with opt-out mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a comprehensive official government portal for Liechtenstein.
  2. Content is well-structured with extensive navigation covering many public service topics.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found in the provided content.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Uses Matomo analytics with opt-out, indicating some privacy consideration.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No visible security headers in the provided data; SSL usage implied but not detailed.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe and government-focused.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web standards with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. The presence of Pimcore CMS is inferred from navigation element IDs and structure, indicating a robust content management system. Matomo analytics is used for tracking with an opt-out mechanism, reflecting privacy-aware data collection. The site is mobile-optimized with a responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, suggesting potential for optimization. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Technical risks include the lack of visible security headers and incomplete privacy disclosures, which could affect user trust and regulatory compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with llv.li. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review llv.li.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.