Skip to main content

Security report for llo.lv

Leja Law Office · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leja Law Office is a small professional services firm based in Latvia, specializing in legal and accounting services. The company emphasizes high-quality service delivered by highly educated and experienced staff, targeting clients who require expert legal and tax planning assistance. The website presents a professional image with clear contact information and multilingual support, indicating a regional market focus. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor, with standard modern web technologies and Google Analytics for tracking. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent implemented, though security headers and incident response information are lacking. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, but the absence of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching llo.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Leja Law Office operates in the legal and accounting sector, offering comprehensive services including juridical and bookkeeping support. The firm appears to position itself as a quality-focused boutique provider with personalized client service. The business model is service-oriented, targeting local and regional clients in Latvia. The website's multilingual options suggest an intent to serve Latvian, Russian, and English-speaking clients. The firm does not display partnerships or subsidiaries on the site, indicating an independent operation. The presence of privacy and cookie policies reflects awareness of regulatory compliance. The use of Google Analytics indicates a moderate level of digital marketing sophistication.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communication, and a cookie consent banner supports GDPR compliance. However, no advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security or incident response policy or dedicated security contact, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers and documented incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security or incident response policy page including contact details for reporting security issues.
  3. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant certifications or trust badges to increase business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Leja Law Office
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Leja Law Office
Description
Leja Law Office darbinieki un partneri ir ar vienu vai pat vairākām augstākajām izglītībām un ilggadīgu darba pieredzi jurisprudencē, nodokļu analīzē un plānošanā, kā arī grāmatvedībā. Augsta piedāvāto pakalpojumu kvalitāte tiek panākta ar mūsu darbinieku un partneru augsto profesionālo līmeni un lielo praktiskās darbības pieredzi. Katram klientam tiek nozīmēts labākais firmas speciālists konkrētā uzdevuma vai jautājuma risināšanā.
Key services
Juridiskie pakalpojumi, Grāmatvedības pakalpojumi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional and relevant to legal and accounting services.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Use of modern CMS and page builder (WordPress and Elementor).
  8. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  9. No social media links found in the content.
  10. Tracking via Google Analytics and Tag Manager is implemented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, leveraging jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for typography and analytics respectively. The site loads CSS and JS assets optimized via Autoptimize plugin. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and asset delivery. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA labels and skip links present but could be improved. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and stable but could benefit from enhanced security and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with llo.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review llo.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.