Skip to main content

Security report for llamaindex.ai

LlamaIndex · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LlamaIndex is a technology company specializing in building AI knowledge assistants over enterprise data. Their offerings include an open source framework and a cloud platform (LlamaCloud) that enable enterprises and developers to build, deploy, and productionize context-augmented AI agents. The company has established a strong market position with a large developer community, significant enterprise adoption, and partnerships with notable organizations such as KPMG and Salesforce. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like Next.js and React, with integrations for analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and HubSpot. The site demonstrates excellent design, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and secure form handling, although there is room for improvement in privacy compliance by adding cookie consent mechanisms and explicit vulnerability disclosure policies. Overall, the website reflects a mature, professional, and trustworthy digital presence aligned with its business goals.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching llamaindex.ai

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LlamaIndex operates in the AI and enterprise software sector, targeting businesses needing advanced knowledge management and AI agent solutions. Their business model combines open source software with cloud-based SaaS offerings, enabling rapid adoption and scalability. The company benefits from a vibrant developer community and strategic enterprise customers, which enhances its competitive advantage. The presence of extensive integrations and community contributions via LlamaHub indicates a strong ecosystem approach. Testimonials from industry leaders reinforce credibility and market relevance. The company appears to be medium-sized with a focus on technology and finance sectors, though no explicit founding year or parent company information is available.

Security posture

The website exhibits a high level of security maturity with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure third-party integrations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a public vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information suggests areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with accessible privacy and terms documents, but lacks an explicit cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by formalizing incident response and vulnerability management disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and enhance security transparency.
  3. Add publicly accessible incident response contact information to improve readiness and trustworthiness.
  4. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant security certifications to strengthen trust signals.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user data handling practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LlamaIndex
Description
LlamaIndex is a simple, flexible framework for building knowledge assistants using LLMs connected to enterprise data. It offers tools and cloud services to build AI knowledge assistants that find information, synthesize insights, generate reports, and take actions over complex enterprise data.
Key services
LlamaCloud (cloud service for knowledge management and AI agents), Open source framework (Python and TypeScript packages), Document parsing (LlamaParse), Data extraction, Agent framework for multi-agent workflows, Community contributions via LlamaHub
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot forms, Python (backend SDK), TypeScript (frontend SDK)
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
GitHub for code repository
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with HubSpot integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong developer and enterprise focus with extensive community and customer testimonials
  3. Good security posture with HTTPS and security headers
  4. Privacy and terms documents are present and accessible
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  8. Active social media presence across multiple platforms
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, ensuring good performance and mobile responsiveness. Integration with Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and HubSpot indicates a mature marketing and analytics infrastructure. The site uses secure HTTPS connections and implements standard security headers. The content is well-structured with clear navigation and professional design. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS approach. Hosting provider details are not explicit but performance and uptime appear reliable. Opportunities exist to improve privacy compliance and formalize security disclosures to reduce technical and compliance risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with llamaindex.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review llamaindex.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.