Skip to main content

Security report for ljunghall.com

Ljunghäll Group · Manufacturing · Sweden

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

33/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ljunghäll Group is a medium-sized manufacturing company specializing in high pressure die casting solutions, operating internationally with offices in Sweden, Czech Republic, China, and Canada. It is part of the Gnutti Carlo Group SPA, a global leader in engine component manufacturing. The website presents a professional image with clear business focus on industrial B2B services. Technically, the site uses older JavaScript libraries and a proprietary CMS (WebbEdit 3.1), with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and cookie consent but lacks modern security headers and uses outdated jQuery, posing potential risks. Privacy compliance is basic with no explicit privacy policy but a cookie banner is present. Overall, the site is credible and trustworthy but would benefit from security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ljunghall.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
33

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid market position as a specialized die casting solution provider within the manufacturing sector, leveraging its parent company Gnutti Carlo's global presence. Its business model focuses on B2B industrial manufacturing with a clear international footprint. The website supports this with multiple office contacts and social media channels. Growth potential is indicated by the multi-country presence and integration with a global group. The partnership ecosystem includes the parent company and subsidiaries, enhancing credibility and operational reach.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version introduces vulnerability risks. No security headers were detected, and there is no visible incident response or security policy documentation. The absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages indicates compliance gaps. The company should prioritize updating libraries, adding security headers, and publishing security and privacy policies to improve its security posture and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current supported versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Develop and publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels.
  5. Conduct a security audit of SSL/TLS configuration and improve it if necessary to ensure strong encryption.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
METALLFABRIKEN LJUNGHÄLL AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ljunghäll Group
Description
Solution provider within high pressure die casting, part of Gnutti Carlo Group SPA, a global leader in valve train and fuel injection components for engines.
Key services
High pressure die casting solutions, Engineering and manufacturing services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7.2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, jquery.mmenu, jquery.matchHeight
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (due to Google Analytics and GTM scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented and functional.
  4. Contact information is comprehensive with multiple international office addresses, emails, and phone numbers.
  5. Website uses outdated jQuery version which poses a security risk.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Good use of social media and external links to parent company and subsidiaries.
  8. Website design and navigation are professional and user-friendly.
  9. No visible SEO or accessibility errors detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the WebbEdit 3.1 CMS platform and uses legacy jQuery 1.7.2, which is outdated and vulnerable. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site is moderately performant with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. However, the technical stack shows signs of aging and would benefit from modernization to improve security and performance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ljunghall.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ljunghall.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.