Skip to main content

Security report for livingbypenta.sk

Other · Slovakia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website livingbypenta.sk/login serves as a client portal login page, primarily targeting existing customers or users of the service. The site is built using Bootstrap 4.6.2 for responsive design and integrates Matomo analytics for user tracking. The domain is registered since 2017 with a stable registration and appropriate nameservers, indicating a legitimate and established presence in Slovakia. However, the site lacks publicly accessible business descriptions, contact information, and legal policies such as privacy or cookie policies, which limits transparency and user trust. From a technical perspective, the website employs standard web technologies and includes cache-control headers to prevent caching of sensitive login pages. The site appears to be mobile-optimized and uses modern frameworks, but SEO and accessibility features are basic. Security headers are minimal, and there is no explicit evidence of HTTPS enforcement or advanced security policies, which could be improved to enhance security posture. Security-wise, no WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and no immediate vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the provided content. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information for incident response, represents compliance gaps, especially under GDPR regulations. The use of Matomo analytics suggests some level of user tracking, but without clear privacy disclosures, this may pose privacy concerns. Overall, the website is functional as a login portal but lacks comprehensive compliance and transparency features. Strategic improvements in privacy policy publication, security header implementation, and contact information disclosure are recommended to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching livingbypenta.sk

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain livingbypenta.sk is associated with a business likely operating in Slovakia, founded around 2017. The website functions as a client portal, suggesting a business model focused on providing services or products to registered users or clients. The lack of public-facing business descriptions or marketing content limits detailed market positioning analysis. The use of Matomo analytics indicates an interest in user behavior tracking, possibly for service improvement or marketing insights. The business appears to be small in size, with no visible partnerships or subsidiaries linked from the site. The stable domain registration and use of a known hosting provider suggest operational stability. However, the absence of trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials limits competitive advantage visibility.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. The presence of cache-control headers is a positive practice to prevent sensitive data caching. However, the lack of comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. There is no visible evidence of HTTPS enforcement in the provided data, which is critical for protecting user credentials on a login page. The site uses Matomo analytics, which is privacy-focused compared to other analytics platforms, but without privacy disclosures, user data protection is uncertain. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which is a compliance and operational gap. Overall, the site should enhance its security headers, enforce HTTPS, and publish security and privacy policies to improve its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS across the entire website to secure user data in transit.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  3. Add contact information including support and security incident response channels to improve transparency and user trust.
  4. Enhance security headers by adding Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Regularly audit and update analytics and tracking implementations to ensure privacy compliance and minimize user tracking risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.6.2, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No-cache headers present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a client login portal with minimal public content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or security policies disclosed.
  4. Uses Matomo analytics for tracking.
  5. Bootstrap framework used for UI styling.
  6. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  7. WHOIS data indicates a legitimate domain with stable registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 4.6.2 for responsive design and includes Matomo analytics for tracking. The HTML includes meta tags for viewport and cache control, indicating attention to mobile optimization and data freshness. The hosting provider appears to be regzone.cz based on nameservers, suggesting a European hosting environment. Performance is likely moderate given the use of standard frameworks and external font loading from Google Fonts. Accessibility features are basic, with no explicit ARIA roles or advanced accessibility markup detected. SEO optimization is minimal, with an empty meta description tag. The site lacks structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags, limiting rich search engine results. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhancements in SEO, accessibility, and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with livingbypenta.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review livingbypenta.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.