Skip to main content

Security report for liveyourtruth.com

Carol Tuttle · E-commerce · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'my.liveyourtruth.com' represents a personal style and fashion guidance platform branded under Carol Tuttle. It offers educational content, quizzes, and an integrated e-commerce store selling jewelry, makeup, clothing, and accessories tailored to personal style types. The business targets individuals seeking personalized fashion advice and related products. The site is built on WordPress with a mature technical infrastructure including multiple marketing and analytics integrations such as Klaviyo, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Visual Website Optimizer. The presence of structured data and SEO optimizations indicates a focus on discoverability and user engagement. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks explicit security headers and privacy policies in the analyzed content. The absence of WHOIS data for the subdomain reduces domain trust but the website content and technical setup suggest a legitimate and established business. Overall, the site is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liveyourtruth.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the niche e-commerce and educational sector focused on personal style and fashion. It leverages a multi-channel approach combining content marketing, quizzes, and product sales. The integration with Shopify for the shop and Zendesk for customer support indicates a mature operational model. The target audience is style-conscious consumers interested in personalized fashion advice. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and a clear market position. Revenue streams likely include product sales, memberships, and possibly affiliate marketing. The partnership ecosystem includes Shopify and third-party marketing platforms. Growth indicators include active content updates and diversified product offerings.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communications. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The site uses multiple third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which require regular auditing to prevent vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. The lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies indicates a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. Incident response and security contact information are not present, limiting transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information for security incidents and establish an incident response process.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide detailed data retention policies to improve user trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Carol Tuttle
Description
Personal style that’s true to you. This FREE video guide shows you how to dress true to your personality.
Key services
Personal style educational content, Online quizzes for style determination, E-commerce sales of jewelry, makeup, clothing, and accessories, Membership and lifestyle programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.9.3, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Pinterest tracking, Klaviyo marketing, Revolution Slider plugin, Yoast SEO plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure external scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Analytics, Klaviyo Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Pinterest Tag, Klaviyo
Marketing tools
Klaviyo, Visual Website Optimizer
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based e-commerce and content platform focused on personal style and fashion.
  2. No WHOIS data available for the subdomain, indicating possible privacy or subdomain usage.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  4. Extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Good SEO and structured data implementation.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; HTTPS is used.
  8. No adult or NSFW content detected.
  9. Navigation and content structure are clear and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.9.3 with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Pinterest tracking, and Klaviyo marketing tools. It uses the Revolution Slider and Yoast SEO plugins, indicating a focus on user experience and search engine optimization. The site loads multiple external resources from trusted domains such as Amazon S3, Shopify, and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and deferred CSS. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and mobile-specific navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social sharing. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liveyourtruth.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liveyourtruth.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.