Skip to main content

Security report for liveramp.com

LiveRamp · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LiveRamp is a mature enterprise technology company specializing in data collaboration and identity resolution platforms for marketers and their partners. The company holds a strong market position with over 900 global customers including many Fortune 500 firms. Their platform enables data connectivity across digital and physical channels, empowering personalized marketing and analytics. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and marketing tools integrated, hosted on WP Engine and delivered via Cloudflare CDN. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and rich in content, reflecting a high level of digital maturity. Security posture is moderate; while security headers and HSTS are properly configured, the SSL certificate is invalid or missing, and modern TLS protocols are not enabled, which poses a significant risk. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and consent mechanisms in place. Overall, the website demonstrates professionalism and trustworthiness but requires urgent SSL and TLS improvements to enhance security and user trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of liveramp.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liveramp.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
97
Security headers
100
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LiveRamp operates in the technology sector, focusing on enterprise data collaboration solutions. Their business model is B2B SaaS, targeting enterprise marketers and data professionals. The company leverages partnerships with major technology and media platforms, as evidenced by their partner directory and customer logos. Revenue streams likely include platform subscriptions, data services, and consulting. The presence of a bug bounty program and trust center indicates a mature security culture. Their global presence is supported by multiple localized domains. The company emphasizes data ethics, privacy, and compliance, aligning with market demands for responsible data use. Strategic partnerships and a comprehensive service portfolio position LiveRamp as a leader in identity and data collaboration.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level. Key strengths include the use of multiple security headers, HSTS enforcement, and absence of known SSL vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE. However, the invalid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS support are critical weaknesses that undermine secure communications. The absence of OCSP stapling and session resumption reduces SSL performance and security. No explicit security policy or incident response information is found, which could impact transparency and readiness. The presence of a bug bounty page is a positive indicator of proactive vulnerability management. Overall, the security posture requires remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhanced transparency to meet enterprise standards.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately renew or fix the SSL certificate to enable valid HTTPS with support for TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3.
  2. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update security headers and TLS configurations to maintain best practices.
  5. Consider pursuing recognized security certifications such as ISO 27001 to strengthen market credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, GSAP animations, and WP Rocket for performance optimization. Hosting is provided by WP Engine with Cloudflare CDN for global delivery and security. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) is implemented for rich search results. The site includes integrations with Google Tag Manager, Intellimize for personalization, Drift chat, and Bugherd for feedback. Performance metrics were not available, but the use of WP Rocket and CDN suggests good optimization. Accessibility is basic but present. Technical risks include outdated or missing SSL/TLS configurations which could impact user trust and compliance. Overall, the infrastructure is modern and scalable but requires SSL improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100 −1Low23 findingsView report
  2. 79/100Low22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liveramp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liveramp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.