Skip to main content

Security report for livas.lv

Livas · Telecommunications · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Livas is a Latvian telecommunications group offering a range of services including cable TV, digital TV, interactive TV, internet, and telephony for residential and business customers. The company positions itself as a leader in the Latvian telecom market with a professional online presence and a clear service portfolio. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, and Swiper slider. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing purposes. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and some security headers but lacks a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy and incident response information. Privacy and cookie policies are present, though a cookie consent mechanism is missing, which may affect GDPR compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy with moderate technical and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching livas.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
75
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
28
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Livas operates in the telecommunications sector in Latvia, targeting both residential and corporate clients. Its business model revolves around bundled and standalone telecom services, including internet, TV, and telephony. The company leverages digital marketing tools and maintains social media presence on Facebook and Instagram. The website content and service offerings indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a stable market position. The absence of detailed WHOIS data and company registration information limits deeper business verification. The company emphasizes customer service with professional technical support and free installation as key advantages.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and some security headers present. However, the Content-Security-Policy header is empty, and there is no visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page. No incident response contacts or security policies are published. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the analysis. Privacy compliance is partial, with privacy and cookie policies present but lacking explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be improved by implementing stronger security headers, incident response information, and enhanced privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS and related attacks.
  2. Add a security.txt file or dedicated vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Livas
Description
LIVAS grupa ir viena no līderiem telekomunikācijas pakalpojumu sniegšanas sfērā Latvijā. Piedāvā kabeļtelevīzijas, digitālās televīzijas, IP televīzijas, telefonijas un interneta pakalpojumus mājai, biznesam, skolai un korporatīvajiem klientiem.
Key services
Kabeļtelevīzija + Internets, Digitālā televīzija + Internets, Interaktīvā televīzija + Internets, Internets, Televīzija, Telefonija
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap 4/5 (minified CSS and JS), FontAwesome 5.15.4, Swiper slider, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Modernizr
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses modern technologies and tracking tools.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present but cookie consent mechanism is missing.
  5. No visible contact emails found; phone number provided.
  6. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  7. Content is relevant and professional for telecommunications sector.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  9. No explicit or adult content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and common technology stack including jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap, FontAwesome 5.15.4, and Swiper slider for UI components. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and has good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility features. The absence of a CMS or hosting provider information limits deeper infrastructure insights. The site uses multiple JavaScript plugins for animations, counters, and galleries, indicating a feature-rich but potentially heavier frontend. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and privacy mechanisms could be enhanced.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with livas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review livas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.