Skip to main content

Security report for littlebigconnection.com

LittleBig Connection · Technology · France

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LittleBig Connection is a technology-focused collaborative platform that connects large companies with freelancers and consulting firms specializing in technology and engineering. It operates a global marketplace and management platform with a presence in 50 countries and a community of 500,000 experts. The company is part of the Mantu group and emphasizes long-term, high-impact projects. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and animation frameworks, delivering a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, robust security headers, and certifications including ISO 27001 and ISO 9001. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with good SEO, trust indicators, and extensive analytics usage.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching littlebigconnection.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
87
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
43
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention littlebigconnection.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,229
Employees
20
Customers
1,153
Third parties
56
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2026-06-13 · 9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for littlebigconnection.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –preview.littlebigconnection.com2026-06-13
  • –littlebigconnection.com2026-06-09
  • –uat.littlebigconnection.com2026-06-05
  • –littlebigconnection.com2026-05-29
  • –uat.littlebigconnection.com2026-05-28

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a key player in connecting enterprises with external experts, leveraging a marketplace and service management platform. Its competitive advantage lies in its large expert community, global reach, and certified security posture. The business model includes subscription and sourcing services for freelancers and consulting firms. Partnerships with Mantu and integrations with multiple marketing and analytics tools indicate a well-established ecosystem. Growth potential is supported by a strong brand, certifications, and a focus on quality and security.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, strong TLS protocols, and comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and XSS protection. No known SSL vulnerabilities are present. The presence of ISO 27001 certification and a high Cybervadis cybersecurity score further reinforce security maturity. However, some CSP directives allow 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval', which could be tightened. OCSP stapling is not enabled, and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, suggesting areas for improvement in transparency and response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable OCSP stapling to improve SSL handshake performance and security.
  2. Strengthen Content Security Policy by removing 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' where possible.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Add explicit incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  5. Consider enabling HSTS preload and including subdomains for stricter transport security.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted likely on OVH infrastructure, using WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, GSAP, ScrollMagic, and Lottie animations. Performance is moderate with caching and lazy loading implemented. SEO is well handled with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but functional. The site integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, marketing, and customer engagement, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. Technical risks are low, but some CSP relaxations and lack of OCSP stapling present minor improvement opportunities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with littlebigconnection.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review littlebigconnection.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.