Skip to main content

Security report for litovel.eu

Městský úřad Litovel · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.litovel.eu serves as the official digital portal for the city of Litovel, Czech Republic. It provides comprehensive municipal information, citizen services, event calendars, official announcements, and tourism-related content. The site targets residents and visitors, positioning itself as a trusted local government resource. The business model is that of a government municipal service portal, focusing on transparency and community engagement. Technically, the site employs a modern yet straightforward technology stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and a custom CMS named Public4u. It integrates accessibility features such as a voice assistant and supports multiple languages via Google Translate. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured navigation. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or vulnerability disclosure program. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented, indicating basic GDPR compliance. The absence of WHOIS data limits transparency but does not detract from the site's legitimacy given its official nature. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile with a solid foundation for municipal digital services. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and enhanced privacy disclosures would further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching litovel.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The city of Litovel operates this website as a primary communication channel with its citizens and visitors. The site reflects a stable market position as a local government authority, offering essential services such as administrative information, document downloads, and event notifications. The partnership ecosystem includes regional government bodies, cultural institutions, and tourism portals, enhancing community integration. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on public service delivery. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and digital accessibility features. Revenue streams are not applicable as this is a government entity. The site supports community outreach and transparency, aligning with public sector best practices.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The site enforces HTTPS, uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, and implements cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks visible security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, limiting transparency for security researchers. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML source. Compliance with GDPR is indicated but could be enhanced with clearer data retention policies and a dedicated security policy. Overall, the site is secure for general use but would benefit from adopting additional security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and vulnerability disclosure program (e.g., security.txt) to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing explicit GDPR-related information.
  5. Continue improving accessibility features and maintain consistent branding to strengthen user trust and engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Městský úřad Litovel
Registration number
00299138
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Městský úřad Litovel
Description
Official website of the city of Litovel providing municipal information, services, news, and event calendars.
Key services
Municipal information, Citizen services, Event calendar, Official announcements, Tourism information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Google Tag Manager, Voiceflow Chat Widget, Public4u CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to municipal services and residents.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy policies and query failure.
  4. Site uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and accessible.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active.
  8. Multiple partner domains related to local government and cultural institutions are linked.
  9. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
  10. Site includes voice assistant functionality for accessibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Public4u CMS platform, utilizing jQuery and jQuery UI libraries for interactivity. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and a Voiceflow chat widget for voice assistant functionality. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive CSS and includes accessibility enhancements such as keyboard navigation and voice reading. Performance is moderate, with multiple external scripts that could impact load times. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and structured navigation menus. The site lacks advanced frameworks but maintains a stable and maintainable technical infrastructure suitable for a municipal government portal.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with litovel.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review litovel.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.