Skip to main content

Security report for litomerice.cz

Město Litoměřice · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Město Litoměřice operates an official municipal website serving residents, tourists, and local businesses by providing comprehensive information about city governance, events, tourism, and public services. The site is positioned as the primary digital portal for the city, offering a broad range of services and information relevant to its audience. The business model is government/public service focused, targeting a general audience with an emphasis on community engagement and transparency. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Maps API, and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Matomo. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility features, and SEO practices, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure suitable for a municipal entity. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. While explicit security headers are not fully evident, the site follows best practices such as CSRF token usage and avoids exposing sensitive data. No critical vulnerabilities were detected in the content, indicating a solid security posture. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, though the absence of WHOIS data reduces domain registration transparency. The site is not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms, allowing full content access. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers and maintaining regular updates to CMS and libraries to sustain security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching litomerice.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Litoměřice's website reflects a well-established municipal government presence with a focus on community services, cultural events, and tourism promotion. The site leverages partnerships with local institutions such as social services, police, and healthcare providers, enhancing its service ecosystem. The business model is non-commercial, centered on public administration and citizen engagement. The site’s content and structure indicate a medium-sized municipal operation with consistent branding and a good reputation. Growth indicators include active event calendars and integration of modern communication tools like push notifications. The partnership ecosystem is robust, linking to relevant local organizations and services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and GDPR-compliant cookie consent. The use of CSRF tokens in forms and absence of exposed sensitive data are positive indicators. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No visible vulnerabilities or security incidents were found in the content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which is common for municipal sites but could be enhanced for transparency. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Maintain up-to-date Joomla CMS and third-party libraries to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit cookie and privacy compliance to ensure ongoing GDPR adherence and user trust.
  5. Enhance WHOIS domain registration transparency by ensuring accurate and public domain registration data.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Město Litoměřice
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Město Litoměřice
Description
Město Litoměřice official website providing information about the city, local government, events, tourism, and public services.
Key services
City news and updates, Event calendar, Tourism information, Public administration services, Contact and directory information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Maps API, Matomo Analytics, Google Analytics, OneSignal Push Notifications, Joomla CMS, FontAwesome, N3tCookieConsent
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Joomla
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CSRF tokens in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
OneSignal Push Notifications
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official city government portal for Litoměřice, Czech Republic.
  2. Content is rich with news, events, cultural and tourism information.
  3. Uses Joomla CMS with modern front-end technologies.
  4. Includes cookie consent and privacy policy compliant with GDPR.
  5. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a government domain.
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  7. Good accessibility features implemented.
  8. Uses multiple analytics and marketing tools with user consent.
  9. No security incidents or vulnerabilities detected in the content.
  10. Contact information is clearly provided with official emails and phone numbers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature and widely supported technology stack centered on Joomla CMS, Bootstrap for responsive design, and jQuery for client-side scripting. Integration with Google Maps API and push notification services like OneSignal indicates a modern approach to user engagement. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and resource management. Accessibility features are well implemented, including a dedicated accessibility toolbar. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured data usage. Technical risks include potential outdated CMS components and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with litomerice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review litomerice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.