Skip to main content

Security report for literadtour.net

LITERADTOUR · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LITERADTOUR is a small cultural project based in Germany, focused on promoting reading and literature through a book ambassador traveling across the country. The website is professionally designed using Squarespace, featuring good mobile optimization and clear navigation. The project leverages social media platforms such as Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, and Facebook to engage its audience. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and enforces HTTPS with HSTS, indicating a strong security posture. However, the absence of a privacy policy, terms of service, and verified contact information limits its privacy compliance and business credibility. Additionally, the WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain may not be registered, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the site is safe and trustworthy for general audiences but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching literadtour.net

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention literadtour.net, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for literadtour.net right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project operates in the cultural and literary sector, targeting readers, bookstores, publishers, and authors in Germany. Its business model appears to be non-profit or personal, relying on crowdfunding and donations. The market position is niche, focusing on literary promotion rather than commercial sales. The presence of crowdfunding links and social media engagement suggests active community involvement. The lack of detailed business registration or company information indicates a small-scale operation. Growth potential depends on community support and visibility through events and social media.

Security posture

The website demonstrates good security practices with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent banner. No security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of a privacy policy and incident response contact reduces compliance maturity. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is solid for a small project but lacks formal policies and incident management transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and responsibilities.
  3. Provide clear contact information, including an email address for general and security inquiries.
  4. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LITERADTOUR
Description
2025 fährt Lennart Schaefer als Buchbotschafter sieben Monate durch ganz Deutschland und besucht Buchhandlungen, Verlage, Autor*innen und viele mehr. Sei dabei!
Key services
Book ambassador tours, Visits to bookstores, publishers, authors, Crowdfunding and donations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Fonts, YouTube embed, Squarespace JavaScript libraries
Platforms
Squarespace hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace with professional design and good mobile responsiveness.
  2. Content is focused on a literary ambassador project in Germany.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is a concern for legitimacy.
  7. Social media links are present and active.
  8. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, utilizing its native CMS and hosting services. It incorporates Google Fonts and embeds YouTube videos for multimedia content. The site loads with moderate performance and is optimized for mobile devices. SEO is supported through proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected. The technical infrastructure is modern and stable, suitable for the project's scale and scope.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with literadtour.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review literadtour.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.