Skip to main content

Security report for listofsex.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.listofsex.com operates as an adult affiliate directory, providing links to a wide range of adult content websites. It targets adult users seeking various categories of adult entertainment, monetizing primarily through affiliate marketing and advertising networks such as ExoClick. The site offers a basic user interface with categorized links but lacks comprehensive business transparency and trust indicators. Technically, the site uses standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with embedded ad scripts but does not appear to enforce HTTPS or implement advanced security headers. The absence of WHOIS registrant data and domain registration details raises concerns about legitimacy and accountability. Privacy compliance is minimal, with a basic cookie notice but no clear consent mechanism or GDPR adherence. Overall, the site presents moderate technical maturity but weak security and compliance posture, posing risks to user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching listofsex.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model is focused on adult affiliate marketing, linking users to external adult content providers. The site operates in a niche market with many competitors but lacks clear branding or corporate identity. Revenue streams likely derive from ad impressions and affiliate commissions. The target audience is adult consumers of online adult content. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries, and the domain's WHOIS data is missing, which may indicate privacy protection or lack of proper registration. The site’s growth potential is limited by its basic design and lack of trust signals. The partnership ecosystem is limited to ad networks and affiliate programs without direct business relationships disclosed.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. The site lacks HTTPS enforcement visible in the HTML content, no security headers are detected, and there is no evidence of secure data handling or incident response policies. No forms or sensitive data collection reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant transparency further reduce trust. Privacy policies are basic and do not demonstrate GDPR compliance. The site relies heavily on third-party ad networks, which may introduce additional privacy and security risks. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires significant improvements to meet industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with proper SSL certificates and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Enhance privacy policy to clearly state GDPR compliance and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Publish clear contact and incident response information including security contact emails.
  5. Improve domain registration transparency and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Your gateway to all the best sex sites of the world.
Key services
Listing and linking to adult websites, Advertising adult content, Affiliate referrals
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, ExoClick Ads, Custom ad scripts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms detected to collect sensitive data
  • No exposed credentials in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
ExoClick
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult affiliate directory linking to numerous external adult sites
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible unregistered or privacy-protected domain
  3. No HTTPS enforcement visible in HTML content
  4. No privacy or security certifications found
  5. Contact info limited to generic email addresses in footer
  6. Heavy use of third-party adult ad networks (ExoClick)
  7. No social media or corporate presence detected
  8. Basic website design with minimal branding or trust signals
  9. No forms or user data collection observed
  10. No security headers or advanced security features detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It integrates third-party advertising scripts from ExoClick and other ad providers. The site is mobile responsive with basic CSS media queries but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. Performance is moderate with some preloaded images and asynchronous script loading. Accessibility features are minimal, and SEO optimization is basic with meta description and canonical tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags. The site does not appear to use modern CMS or hosting provider identification. Technical debt is low due to simplicity but modernization opportunities exist to improve security, performance, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with listofsex.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review listofsex.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.