Skip to main content

Security report for lisikpng.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lisikpng.com appears to be a small personal or hobbyist website created in 2022, with minimal content welcoming visitors and linking to nostalgic computing resources. The site lacks formal business information, contact details, and privacy or security policies, indicating it is not a commercial or enterprise-level operation. The technical infrastructure is basic, utilizing standard HTML and CSS with Google Fonts and Cloudflare DNS services, but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. Security posture is minimal with no DNSSEC enabled and no visible security headers or policies. There are no forms or data collection mechanisms, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user engagement. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences but lacks professional and compliance features expected in business websites.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lisikpng.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets general users interested in retro computing and personal projects, offering limited services such as a personal CDN and an IP masking page. There is no evidence of revenue streams, partnerships, or market positioning beyond a hobbyist scope. The absence of contact information and formal policies suggests a non-commercial intent. The site’s small size and recent domain registration align with a personal or experimental project rather than a business entity.

Security posture

Security maturity is low, with no published security policies, incident response contacts, or certifications. The domain uses Cloudflare DNS but does not enable DNSSEC, and no security headers are detected. The site does not collect user data, which reduces exposure but also indicates limited security controls. There are no indications of vulnerabilities or malicious content, but the lack of HTTPS enforcement details and security best practices is a concern for trust and data protection.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and integrity.
  2. Publish a privacy policy and cookie policy to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Add contact information or a contact form to improve transparency and communication.
  4. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Consider HTTPS enforcement and certificate validation to secure user connections.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal or small-scale website with minimal content, welcoming visitors as 'Lisya'. Contains links to related nostalgic or retro computing sites and a placeholder for 'TheFox Workspace'.
Key services
CDN (personal), IP-MASK service (page link)
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, Google Fonts (Jura), Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a small personal or hobbyist site with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details provided.
  4. No security policies or incident response information available.
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  6. Site uses Cloudflare DNS but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. Technical implementation is basic with some modern elements like Google Fonts.
  10. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple HTML and CSS structure with Google Fonts integration and Cloudflare DNS hosting. There is no CMS or JavaScript frameworks detected, indicating low technical complexity. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content and external font usage. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal with only a meta description tag and no Open Graph or structured data. The site could benefit from modernization and improved technical standards to enhance user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lisikpng.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lisikpng.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.