Skip to main content

Security report for lintera.lv

"LINTERA RĪGA" SIA · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LINTERA RĪGA, SIA is a Latvian company specializing in industrial automation and woodworking equipment, offering sales, service, and tool sharpening solutions. The company maintains a strong market position in Latvia with partnerships with reputable industrial brands, targeting B2B customers in manufacturing and woodworking sectors. Their website reflects a professional digital presence with clear business information and compliance policies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and employs modern plugins and analytics tools, ensuring good performance and SEO optimization. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, though some advanced security headers are missing. Overall, the company demonstrates a solid security posture and GDPR compliance, though no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lintera.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on industrial automation and woodworking machinery. Their business model is B2B, providing equipment, maintenance, and sharpening services. The website showcases a broad partner ecosystem with well-known brands, indicating strong industry relationships. Contact information is comprehensive, supporting customer engagement. The presence of privacy and cookie policies reflects regulatory compliance. The company appears medium-sized with a consistent brand image and good content quality, supporting trustworthiness and market credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security posture. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented to comply with GDPR. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to enforce HTTPS and prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Conduct periodic security assessments and penetration testing to proactively identify and remediate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
"LINTERA RĪGA" SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
"LINTERA RĪGA" SIA
Description
Automatizācijas, kokapstrādes, vadības sistēmu un aprīkojuma servisa risinājumi.
Key services
Industrial automation equipment sales, Woodworking machinery sales, Service and maintenance of woodworking equipment, Sharpening and repair of cutting tools, Hydraulics and industrial instruments
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, WPBakery Page Builder, Ultimate VC Addons, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Perfect WooCommerce Brands
Frameworks
WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms policies present indicating GDPR compliance.
  4. Multiple contact methods including phone, email, physical address, and contact forms.
  5. Strong partner ecosystem with reputable industrial brands.
  6. Uses modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce and various plugins for e-commerce and SEO.
  7. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lacks some advanced security headers.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  10. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Ultimate VC Addons for content management and layout. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for traffic analysis. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features, though these could be enhanced. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional online presence suitable for the company's business needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lintera.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lintera.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.