Skip to main content

Security report for linkgp.com.br

Other · Brazil

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LinkGP is an adult services platform based in Brazil offering listings for virtual and in-person escorts including women, men, and trans individuals. The platform allows free advertising for service providers and targets adult users seeking companionship and virtual sex services across Brazil. The website is built on WordPress with Bootstrap framework and uses Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN services. The technical infrastructure is basic but functional, with moderate performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is limited, with no visible security headers or published security policies, and no incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is minimal with no privacy or cookie policies detected. Overall, the website presents a basic online presence with limited trust and security indicators, suitable for a small niche adult service platform.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching linkgp.com.br

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the adult services sector, focusing on escort and virtual sex services in Brazil. It leverages a free advertising model to attract service providers and users. The market position is niche with no evident partnerships or certifications. The platform's revenue model likely depends on advertising or premium listings, though no explicit monetization details are found. The target audience is adult individuals in Brazil seeking companionship services. The company appears small with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The branding is moderately consistent but lacks trust signals such as certifications or testimonials.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low. It lacks published privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. No security headers are detected, and no incident response or abuse contact information is provided. The use of HTTPS is implied but not confirmed in the data. There are no indications of vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files. The absence of these elements increases risk exposure and reduces user trust. The platform should prioritize implementing security best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options
  3. Add clear contact information including security and abuse contacts for incident response
  4. Enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and monitor for vulnerabilities
  5. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt to improve transparency and trust
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Site com garotas de programa virtuais e presenciais, realize sexo virtual ou real em todo o Brasil. Você pode se anunciar gratuitamente ou achar acompanhantes mulheres, homens ou trans ou com preços acessíveis em sua região!
Key services
Listing of escorts (women, men, trans), Virtual sex services, Free advertising for service providers
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Cloudflare DNS, Bootstrap CSS, jQuery (implied by Bootstrap usage), Video.js or Plyr (video players)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult services platform focused on escorts and virtual sex in Brazil
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and Cloudflare DNS
  5. No security headers detected in provided data
  6. No incident response or security contact information available
  7. No certifications or compliance indicators present
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. Content and design quality are basic with moderate branding consistency
  10. No advertising or analytics services detected in the HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap for responsive design and Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services. Video player libraries such as Video.js or Plyr are used for media content. The site has basic mobile optimization and moderate performance. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no advanced structured data beyond WebPage schema. Accessibility features are minimal. The technical stack is standard for small to medium WordPress sites but lacks advanced optimization or security hardening. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with linkgp.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review linkgp.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.