Skip to main content

Security report for linkedin.it

LinkedIn · Technology · Italy

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LinkedIn Italia is the Italian localized subdomain of LinkedIn, a global professional networking platform owned by Microsoft. The website offers users the ability to manage their professional identity, connect with others, find jobs, access learning resources, and engage with professional content. It targets professionals, job seekers, recruiters, and learners in Italy, providing a comprehensive platform for career development and networking. The site is well-branded, professionally designed, and supports multiple languages and authentication methods including Google and Microsoft sign-in. From a technical perspective, the site employs modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, secure authentication integrations, and optimized performance for desktop and mobile. The presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms indicates compliance with GDPR and related privacy regulations. Security best practices such as HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and secure form handling are observed, contributing to a strong security posture. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. The WHOIS data for the subdomain is not separately available, which is typical for subdomains, but the parent linkedin.com domain is a well-established and trusted domain owned by Microsoft. Overall, the site demonstrates a high level of professionalism, security, and compliance suitable for an enterprise-grade platform. Strategic recommendations include maintaining continuous security audits, ensuring up-to-date third-party libraries, and enhancing transparency around data retention policies to further strengthen user trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching linkedin.it

This scan found 10 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
90
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention linkedin.it, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7
Employees
0
Customers
7
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for linkedin.it.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LinkedIn holds a dominant position in the professional networking market globally, with a diversified business model that includes premium subscriptions, recruitment solutions, advertising, and online learning. The Italian localized site supports this ecosystem by catering to local language and market needs. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its extensive user base, integration with Microsoft services, and comprehensive suite of career development tools. Revenue streams are primarily from enterprise clients (recruiters, advertisers) and premium individual users. The platform targets professionals across industries, educational institutions, and enterprises. Growth indicators include continuous feature expansion, localized content, and integration with global services. Partnerships with Google and Microsoft for authentication enhance user convenience and security.

Security posture

LinkedIn Italia exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, robust security headers, and secure authentication mechanisms. The site uses CSRF tokens in forms and sandboxed iframes for third-party authentication, reducing attack surface. Privacy policies and cookie consent banners demonstrate compliance with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, continuous monitoring and timely patching of third-party components are essential to maintain security. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly visible on the homepage, which is common for large enterprises that manage these through dedicated channels.

Recommendations

  1. Maintain regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish or link to a dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to enhance transparency.
  3. Enhance visibility of incident response contacts or security reporting channels for improved trust.
  4. Continue to update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate emerging threats.
  5. Provide clearer data retention policies and user data management options to strengthen privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LinkedIn
Description
LinkedIn is a professional networking platform with over 1 billion users. It allows users to manage their professional identity, build and interact with their professional network, access knowledge, important information, and numerous opportunities.
Key services
Professional networking, Job search and recruitment, Online learning and courses, Professional content and articles, Games for engagement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (likely), Google Identity Services, Microsoft Authentication, SVG graphics
Frameworks
LinkedIn proprietary frontend frameworks
Platforms
Web, Android, iOS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login forms with CSRF tokens
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of iframe sandboxing for third-party auth

Analytics and tracking

Services
LinkedIn internal analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn pixel
Marketing tools
LinkedIn marketing solutions
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. Professional and consistent branding aligned with LinkedIn.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Multiple authentication methods integrated (Google, Microsoft, email).
  5. Extensive language and localization support.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed on homepage.
  7. No visible security or privacy policy violations.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with JavaScript-heavy frontend likely based on React or proprietary LinkedIn frameworks. It integrates Google and Microsoft authentication services via iframes and scripts, ensuring secure and seamless login experiences. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles. Performance appears optimized with asynchronous script loading and lazy loading of images. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom-built platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the content but likely managed by Microsoft or LinkedIn infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with linkedin.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review linkedin.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.