Skip to main content

Security report for lindstromgroup.com

Lindström Group · Manufacturing · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lindström Group is a well-established European textile service company with over 175 years of experience, specializing in sustainable textile solutions for various industries including healthcare, food, pharma, and hospitality. The company positions itself as a leading provider of textile services such as workwear, mats, cleanroom textiles, and industrial wipers, targeting B2B customers across Europe. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and several modern plugins including Yoast SEO Premium, Cookiebot CMP for cookie consent, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting appears to be managed via Sonera's global name servers. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though performance is moderate and accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration but lacks visible security headers, which is an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent implemented but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the analyzed content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not evident. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and trustworthy with a strong business credibility score. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, implementing security headers, and enhancing accessibility and contact information visibility to improve user trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lindstromgroup.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
97
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate lindstromgroup.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
8
Registered
8
Resolving
8
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-07-09

Masked preview

  • lu••••••••••••.comMediumreplacement
  • la••••••••••••.comMediumbitsquatting
  • li•••••••••••••.comLowhomoglyph

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of lindstromgroup.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lindström Group operates in the manufacturing sector, specifically textile services, with a business model focused on providing sustainable and hygienic textile solutions to various industries. The company leverages its long history and European market presence to maintain a leading position. Revenue streams likely include service contracts for workwear management, textile cleaning, and specialized textile products. The target customer segments are primarily B2B clients in healthcare, food, pharma, hospitality, and industrial sectors. The company uses a multi-channel digital presence with localized sites for different countries, indicating a broad partnership and operational ecosystem. Growth indicators include continuous innovation in textile services and digital engagement through SEO and marketing tools.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, indicating good operational security hygiene. Compliance gaps exist due to missing explicit privacy and incident response policies, which are critical for GDPR and NIS2 compliance. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file suggests limited transparency in security incident handling. Overall, the security culture appears cautious but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and disclose an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues, including abuse and security@ email addresses.
  4. Create a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features and provide clear, verified contact information to improve user experience and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lindström Group
Description
Lindström is one of Europe's leading textile service companies with over 175 years of experience in the textile industry.
Key services
Workwear, Mats, Cleanroom textiles, Washroom textiles, Cleaning textiles, Hotel textiles, Restaurant textiles, Industrial wipers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot CMP, Post Views Counter plugin, URL Shortify plugin, HubSpot Forms
Frameworks
Astra WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, HubSpot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms, Cookiebot CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on textile services for B2B customers.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage content.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Astra theme and several well-known plugins for SEO, analytics, and cookie management. The tech stack includes jQuery and Google Tag Manager, with hosting supported by Sonera's global DNS infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices evident through meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The site uses Cloudfront CDN for media assets, improving content delivery. Technical risks include lack of security headers and partial privacy compliance. Opportunities exist to modernize accessibility and enhance security configurations to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lindstromgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lindstromgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.