Skip to main content

Security report for lindr.cz

LINDR.CZ.s.r.o. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LINDR.CZ.s.r.o. operates a Czech-language website focused on dispensing equipment, targeting businesses and consumers interested in such products. The company appears to be a medium-sized manufacturing entity with an e-commerce presence via a related subdomain. The website employs modern frontend technologies and integrates essential tools such as Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers are not explicitly visible in the HTML content. No contact information or terms of service pages were found, which slightly impacts the overall trust and compliance assessment. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional, GDPR compliant, and technically sound, serving its target market effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lindr.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialized manufacturer and seller of dispensing equipment in the Czech Republic. Its business model includes direct sales and e-commerce through a dedicated subdomain. The website's integration with major advertising and analytics platforms like Google and Facebook indicates active marketing and retargeting efforts. The absence of explicit contact details on the main site suggests potential areas for improvement in customer engagement and transparency. The use of Cookiebot and compliance with GDPR reflects awareness of regulatory requirements. The company likely targets both B2B and B2C segments within the manufacturing and retail sectors.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. Integration of Google reCAPTCHA helps mitigate bot traffic. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options could expose the site to certain risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and publishing security-related policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear contact information and a dedicated security policy page to improve transparency and customer trust.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize tracking risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LINDR.CZ.s.r.o.
Description
Výčepní zařízení - LINDR.CZ.s.r.o.
Key services
Dispensing equipment sales, E-commerce platform (eobchod.lindr.cz)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Fancybox, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Swiper 6.8.4, Select2, NoUISlider, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with Cookiebot
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google AdSense
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent
  2. Multiple cookies and trackers from Google and Facebook detected
  3. No explicit contact information found in the HTML content provided
  4. No terms of service page detected
  5. Website is in Czech language and targets Czech market
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. Good use of modern frontend libraries and frameworks
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with libraries such as jQuery, Fancybox, AOS, Swiper, Select2, and NoUISlider, indicating a rich interactive user experience. Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA are integrated for analytics and security. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design principles. No explicit CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance appears moderate, with potential for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website but could benefit from further performance and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lindr.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lindr.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.