Skip to main content

Security report for lindeberg.legal

Advokaadibüroo LINDEBERG · Other · Estonia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

32/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Advokaadibüroo LINDEBERG is a well-established Estonian law firm providing comprehensive legal services across major law domains including private law, public law, IT and intellectual property, and dispute resolution. The firm serves a diverse clientele including businesses, individuals, and the public sector, with a strong reputation in litigation and recognized partnerships such as with the Estonian E-commerce Association. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, multilingual support, and a broad service offering. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and enhanced by various plugins for SEO, analytics, and marketing, demonstrating a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though improvements like DNSSEC and enhanced security headers are recommended. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, with clear contact information and active use of analytics and marketing pixels under consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, supporting the firm's market position as a leading legal service provider in Estonia.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lindeberg.legal

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
32

Not counted

  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm positions itself as a classical law office with specialization in litigation and various legal fields, targeting businesses, private clients, and public institutions. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on quality legal advice and representation. The presence of podcasts and media collaborations indicates active marketing and thought leadership. The firm is medium-sized with a team of partners, advocates, and jurists, supported by a modern website that facilitates client engagement and information dissemination. Partnerships with recognized legal and business organizations enhance credibility. The firm’s growth is supported by diversified legal services and educational activities such as free and paid trainings.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, domain status flags to prevent unauthorized transfers, and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and common security headers are not explicitly detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing pixels increases tracking but is managed with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is good but can be enhanced by implementing DNSSEC, security headers, and a formal vulnerability disclosure process.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Advokaadibüroo LINDEBERG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Advokaadibüroo LINDEBERG
Description
Advokaadibüroo LINDEBERG on klassikaline advokaadibüroo, mis pakub õigusteenuseid kõigis peamistes õiguse valdkondades. Meie klientideks on nii äriühingud, eraisikud kui ka avalik sektor. Advokaadibüroo LINDEBERG advokaadid on spetsialiseerunud erinevatele valdkondadele, et pakkuda klientidele kvaliteetseimat teenust.
Key services
Era- ja lepinguõigus, Kohtuvaidlused, Avalik õigus, IT ja intellektuaalne omand, Ühinguõigus, Ehitus ja planeerimine, Meditsiiniõigus, Muud teenused ja maksumus
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Slider Revolution, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, PixelYourSite PRO, Contact Form 7, WPML (multilingual), Ultimate VC Addons, jQuery, Bootstrap
Frameworks
WordPress, WooCommerce
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited and ClientUpdateProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Use of security plugins (implied by Contact Form 7 and PixelYourSite PRO)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, PixelYourSite PRO
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite PRO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional legal services firm based in Estonia
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with multilingual support
  3. Uses modern WordPress CMS with multiple plugins for SEO, analytics, and marketing
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  5. Security posture is good but can be improved with DNSSEC and security headers
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  7. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels
  8. Active use of analytics and marketing pixels with consent mechanisms
  9. WHOIS privacy protection is used but justified for this business type
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce integration, leveraging popular plugins for SEO (Yoast), analytics (Google Analytics, PixelYourSite PRO), multilingual support (WPML), and marketing (Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel). The site uses Slider Revolution for dynamic content presentation and Bootstrap for responsive design. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The technical stack is mature but could benefit from improved security configurations and accessibility enhancements. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS and registrar data indicate a standard domain registration with Tucows and DNS servers in Europe.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lindeberg.legal. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lindeberg.legal.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.