Skip to main content

Security report for lindab.dk

Lindab · Manufacturing · Denmark

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lindab is an international manufacturing group specializing in ventilation and building profile products, with a dedicated Danish website targeting construction and building industry professionals. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and relevant business descriptions. Technically, the site uses a modern technology stack including Episerver CMS, Microsoft Azure hosting, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Sleeknote. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and use of reputable third-party services, although explicit security headers and policies are not clearly visible. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the overall digital presence and technical setup indicate a legitimate and mature business operation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lindab.dk

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
92
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lindab operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on ventilation and building profiles, serving the Danish market as part of a larger international group. The business model revolves around product development, manufacturing, and distribution of system solutions for construction and indoor climate improvement. The website reflects a large enterprise with consistent branding and a network of partner domains across Nordic countries and Germany. The company leverages multiple marketing and analytics platforms to optimize user engagement and market reach. However, direct contact information and detailed corporate data are not prominently displayed, which may affect direct customer engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains that support regional operations and specialized services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and integration of security-conscious services like Microsoft Azure and Cloudflare. The cookie consent banner is detailed and compliant with GDPR, indicating attention to privacy regulations. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, which are important for transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security and incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Add visible security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and marketing tools to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lindab
Description
International koncern som udvikler, fremstiller og distribuerer produkter og systemløsninger, til forenkling og forbedring af byggeri og indeklima.
Key services
Ventilation products, Building profiles, System solutions for construction and indoor climate
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (implied by chunked CSS and JS files), Episerver CMS, Microsoft Azure, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Sleeknote, Cloudflare
Frameworks
Episerver
Platforms
Microsoft Azure
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Microsoft and Cloudflare security services

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Episerver Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
LinkedIn Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Sleeknote, HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with modern analytics and marketing tools.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent banner with detailed cookie descriptions.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy or registry restrictions.
  5. No visible terms of service or security policy pages.
  6. Use of multiple third-party services including Microsoft Azure, Episerver, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel.
  7. Good SEO and metadata usage with Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data.
  8. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack with Episerver CMS and hosted on Microsoft Azure, ensuring scalability and reliability. It uses React-based front-end assets and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Sleeknote for lead generation. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site employs DNS prefetch and preconnect hints to optimize resource loading. However, explicit accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data is a technical limitation for domain trust verification but does not impact site functionality.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lindab.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lindab.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.