Skip to main content

Security report for linagora.com

Linagora · Technology · France

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Linagora is a French-based open source software publisher and SaaS solutions provider, established in 2000, with a strong focus on ethical and sovereign digital transformation. The company offers a broad portfolio of open source software products, professional services including support and maintenance for over 500 open source applications, and consulting services. Their market position is that of a pioneer and leader in the French open source ecosystem, serving enterprise clients including government and large corporations. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, employs modern web technologies, and integrates Matomo analytics and Altcha CAPTCHA for user interaction and security. The site is well-optimized for mobile and SEO, with good accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and clientTransferProhibited domain status, though improvements such as DNSSEC and explicit security policies could be made. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the company's history and legitimacy. The website content is professional, comprehensive, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching linagora.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention linagora.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
74
Employees
13
Customers
46
Third parties
15
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-05-21 · 13 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for linagora.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –ci.linagora.com2026-05-21
  • –ci.linagora.com2026-05-14
  • –openpaas.linagora.com2026-05-13
  • –chat.linagora.com2025-12-03
  • –openpaas.linagora.com2025-11-13

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Linagora targets enterprise customers seeking open source digital transformation solutions, leveraging a business model that combines software publishing with professional services and support. Their competitive advantage lies in their deep expertise in open source, strong community ties, and a comprehensive service offering including OSSA (Open Source Software Assurance). The company demonstrates growth through international presence across four continents and a workforce of approximately 200 employees. Their partnership ecosystem includes major clients such as EDF, BNP Paribas, and the French Ministry of Finance. Strategic observations highlight their focus on ethical technology, AI development (OpenLLM Europe), and a commitment to sustainability and positive societal impact.

Security posture

Linagora exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide, use of CAPTCHA to prevent spam on contact forms, and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security policies or incident response procedures indicate areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. The company does not publicly disclose certifications or incident response contacts, which could improve trust and compliance visibility. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from formalized policies and additional DNS security measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file.
  4. Add security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Enhance transparency by listing certifications and compliance attestations if available.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Linagora
Description
Linagora is a French open source software editor and SaaS solutions provider for enterprises, focusing on open source software, digital transformation, and ethical technology.
Key services
Open source software products, Support and maintenance for 500+ open source software, Professional services and consulting, Open source software assurance (OSSA), AI model development (OpenLLM Europe)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Matomo analytics, Altcha CAPTCHA, YouTube embedded videos, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of CAPTCHA (Altcha) on contact forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on open source software solutions and services.
  3. Multiple language options available indicating international presence.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Contact form includes CAPTCHA to prevent spam.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a potential security improvement area.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, leveraging modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It integrates Matomo for analytics, providing privacy-respecting user tracking, and Altcha CAPTCHA for bot mitigation. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content such as embedded YouTube videos. The domain is registered with Gandi SAS, a reputable registrar, and uses clientTransferProhibited status to prevent unauthorized domain transfers. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, indicating a well-maintained infrastructure. Opportunities exist to improve DNS security and implement additional security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with linagora.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review linagora.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.