Skip to main content

Security report for likumuizsekotajs.lv

Government · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Likumu izsekotājs is a Latvian-focused legal technology service that automates the tracking of legislative changes, specifically targeting decisions made by the Cabinet of Ministers and Saeima sessions. The platform leverages artificial intelligence to match user-defined topics with relevant government decisions, streamlining the monitoring process for organizations such as banks, law firms, and municipalities. The service is currently in a pilot phase, inviting large organizations to participate and provide feedback before public release. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Vue.js and ES modules, delivering a responsive and user-friendly experience. While the site demonstrates good design and content quality, there is room for improvement in security posture, particularly in implementing security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of explicit contact emails and phone numbers limits direct communication channels, relying instead on a contact form. From a security perspective, the site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but lacks several best practices such as security headers and vulnerability disclosure information. The WHOIS data indicates a Latvian natural person as registrant, consistent with the website's regional focus, though detailed organizational information is not provided. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with no critical vulnerabilities detected but with opportunities to enhance trust and compliance. Strategically, the company should prioritize strengthening its security framework, enhancing privacy compliance, and expanding contact options to build greater trust with its target enterprise audience. These improvements will support its positioning as a reliable legal-tech solution in the Latvian market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching likumuizsekotajs.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Likumu izsekotājs operates in a niche segment of the legal technology market, focusing on automating legislative tracking for Latvian government decisions. Its competitive advantage lies in leveraging AI to reduce manual monitoring efforts for organizations heavily impacted by regulatory changes. The business model appears to be B2B SaaS with a pilot program targeting large enterprises and public institutions. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees post-pilot. The company targets sectors such as banking, legal services, and government agencies, indicating a specialized customer base. Growth potential depends on successful pilot outcomes and expansion into broader legislative tracking, including Saeima sessions. The partnership ecosystem is currently limited but may expand with pilot participants. Operationally, the company demonstrates a lean digital presence with modern technology but limited public business information.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is basic, with HTTPS presumably enabled but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy details on the landing page suggests partial GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The lack of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries is positive, but the site would benefit from implementing Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and other headers to mitigate common web threats. The use of modern JavaScript frameworks is a strength but requires ongoing maintenance to avoid vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small enterprise but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a detailed privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  4. Provide explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve communication and trust.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and demonstrate security commitment.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Likumu izsekotājs is a service that automates tracking changes in normative acts, specifically focusing on Latvian Cabinet of Ministers decisions and Saeima sessions. It uses AI to help organizations monitor legislative changes relevant to their interests.
Key services
Automated legislative change tracking, AI-based topic matching, Pilot program for early adopters
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Ziggy routing, JavaScript ES modules, CSS with OKLCH colors
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on legislative tracking automation for Latvian government decisions.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found in the HTML but likely present on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found; contact is via form only.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. Modern frontend technologies used (Vue.js, ES modules).
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No explicit business registration or certification info found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Vue.js and ES modules, ensuring a responsive and interactive user experience. The use of Ziggy routing indicates a Laravel backend or similar PHP framework, though backend details are not visible. Performance appears moderate with preloading of CSS and JS assets. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and semantic HTML enhancements. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available, limiting full technical assessment. Overall, the technical infrastructure is sound but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with likumuizsekotajs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review likumuizsekotajs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.