Skip to main content

Security report for liktendarzs.lv

Likteņdārzs · Government · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Likteņdārzs is a Latvian cultural and memorial park website dedicated to commemorating Latvia's heritage, positioned as a non-profit entity serving the general public and visitors interested in Latvian history. The website provides visitor information and encourages support through donations, reflecting a community and cultural engagement business model. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder, integrating Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacks visible security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and technical indicators suggest a legitimate cultural institution. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and enhancing accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liktendarzs.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as an official platform for a Latvian national memorial park, targeting visitors and supporters of Latvian cultural heritage. Its business model is non-profit, relying on public engagement and donations. The site integrates with a partner ticketing/payment domain (store.bilesuserviss.lv), indicating a partnership ecosystem. The content quality and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a high trust level. The site does not display extensive business registration or certification information, typical for non-profit cultural entities. Growth indicators include active visitor engagement and support calls to action. The technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance to strengthen credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable third-party analytics tools, which is positive for security and monitoring. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms or input fields were detected, minimizing attack surface, but also indicating limited direct user data collection. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible links and consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Establish a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security culture.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet modern standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated software.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Likteņdārzs
Description
kopīga dāvana Latvijai 100. dzimšanas dienā
Key services
Visitor information, Support and donations, Cultural and historical education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, Yoast SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, FontAwesome 6.2.1, MPC Massive plugin, Lapulapa Plugins VT Modal
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on Latvian cultural heritage and memorial park.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found on the homepage HTML content.
  4. Contact phone number is present but no email addresses found in the HTML.
  5. Uses modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  8. External links mostly to trusted domains related to ticketing and analytics.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using current versions of core and plugins, including Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder, which supports good SEO and content management capabilities. It uses jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements and integrates Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking user behavior. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs and partner domains. Performance is moderate with no evident blocking or errors. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is basic. The absence of security headers and privacy compliance features represents technical debt and potential risk. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liktendarzs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liktendarzs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.