Skip to main content

Security report for likeit.lv

LikeIT · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LikeIT is a specialized online job board platform focused on the Information Technology sector, connecting IT professionals with employers primarily in Latvia and surrounding regions. The platform offers job listings, employer profiles, and recruitment facilitation services, targeting IT job seekers and companies looking to hire IT talent. The website is professionally designed with a clear navigation structure and mobile optimization, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, it leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js, integrates Stripe for payments, and uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and functional platform for IT recruitment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching likeit.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
50
GDPR outside view
28
Average
45

Not counted

  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a niche job board in the technology sector, focusing on IT professionals and employers. Its business model revolves around providing a platform for job postings and applications, likely generating revenue through job posting fees or premium services. The market position is that of a specialized regional player with a small company size and a history dating back to 2011. The presence of testimonials and active job listings indicates engagement with the target audience. Partnerships with web development firms like bettrweb.com support its digital presence. The company maintains a clear contact and social media presence, which supports customer trust and business growth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Forms appear to be secured with input validation. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contact channels were found, representing an area for improvement. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Stripe is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced with formal policies and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Develop and publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Establish and publicize incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights more explicitly.
  5. Implement accessibility improvements to meet higher standards and broaden user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LikeIT
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LikeIT
Description
LikeIT is a job board dedicated to Information Technologies. It connects IT professionals with employers offering IT jobs.
Key services
Job listings, Job seeker profiles, Employer job postings, Recruitment facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Stripe, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with input validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche job board focused on IT sector
  2. Content is rich with job listings and employer details
  3. Contact information is clearly provided
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and functional
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, enabling server-side rendering and good SEO performance. Integration with Stripe indicates readiness for payment processing, likely for job posting fees. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager supports marketing and user behavior analysis. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and accessibility features. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom-built platform. Hosting details are not explicit, but security headers and HTTPS indicate a professionally managed environment. Technical risks are low but should be monitored continuously.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with likeit.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review likeit.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.