Skip to main content

Security report for liflandgaming.com

Enlabs AB · Other · Sweden

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Enlabs AB operates as a subsidiary of Entain plc, focusing on the Baltics and Nordics regions. The website primarily serves as a corporate landing page promoting career opportunities both regionally and globally through its parent company. The business model centers on employment and corporate presence within the gaming industry. The site content is minimal but consistent with corporate branding and provides direct links to career portals. Technically, the site uses modern CSS frameworks like Tailwind and Google Fonts, delivering a responsive and visually appealing experience. However, the site lacks advanced SEO metadata, structured data, and visible analytics or tracking mechanisms. Security posture is limited with no visible security headers or explicit policies, and privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy of the domain with consistent registrant information matching the business entity in Sweden. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liflandgaming.com

This scan found 10 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
76
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Enlabs AB is positioned as an important entity within the gaming sector under the umbrella of Entain plc. Its market positioning leverages the parent company's global presence, focusing on talent acquisition in the Baltics and Nordics. The business model is employment-centric, with revenue streams likely tied to gaming operations managed by Entain. The target audience includes job seekers and professionals interested in gaming careers. The partnership ecosystem includes direct links to Entain's global career site, indicating close operational integration. Growth indicators are not explicit on the site but implied through career opportunities. Strategic observations suggest a focus on regional market penetration and talent development within a larger corporate structure.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS presumably enabled (not explicitly confirmed in HTML). No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which could expose the site to common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, limiting transparency and readiness. The presence of a dedicated DPO email is a positive indicator for data protection governance. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement in policy visibility and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and inform users about tracking.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility by adding structured data, Open Graph metadata, and ARIA attributes.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Enlabs AB
Description
Enlabs AB is now part of Entain plc, operating in the Baltics and Nordics regions. The website promotes career opportunities in these regions and globally through Entain.
Key services
Employment opportunities, Corporate information
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, Google Fonts (Mulish)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found on the main page.
  3. Contact information limited to corporate and DPO emails only; no phone or physical address found.
  4. No forms detected on the main page; no data collection fields present.
  5. Website content is minimal and focused on corporate branding and career links.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies visible.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  8. Branding consistent with parent company Entain plc.
  9. External links point to career portals and image/font CDNs.
  10. No social media links found in the provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Tailwind CSS for styling and Google Fonts for typography, indicating a modern front-end approach. The HTML structure is valid and supports responsive design, contributing to good mobile optimization. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or backend platform from the provided data. Performance is likely moderate given the use of external font and image CDNs. The absence of analytics scripts suggests minimal user tracking, which aligns with privacy best practices but limits marketing insights. Technical debt appears low due to the site's simplicity, but opportunities exist to improve SEO, accessibility, and security configurations to support business growth and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liflandgaming.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liflandgaming.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.