Skip to main content

Security report for lifewatch.be

LifeWatch Belgium · Government · Belgium

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LifeWatch Belgium is a well-established national research infrastructure supporting biodiversity and ecosystem research. It provides a broad range of scientific data services and collaborates within the European LifeWatch ERIC consortium. The website is professionally designed using Drupal 10, with good mobile optimization and accessibility. Privacy and cookie compliance are well implemented, reflecting GDPR adherence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and policies could be improved. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, registered with BELNET since 2009. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and authoritative presence in its sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lifewatch.be

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LifeWatch Belgium operates as a government/non-profit entity focused on biodiversity data and ecosystem research services. It leverages partnerships with recognized scientific data providers and offers services like species occurrence, taxonomic data, and biodiversity observatory automation. The target audience includes scientists, researchers, and policymakers. The business model centers on providing open scientific data and e-Science infrastructure. The website content and external links reinforce its position as a credible and collaborative research infrastructure node.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics. Cookie consent is implemented with an opt-in mechanism. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security policies and adding missing headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance protection.
  3. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance contact information by providing verified company emails and phone numbers for support and security.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LifeWatch Belgium
Description
LifeWatch Belgium supports biodiversity and ecosystem research by providing data, services, and e-Science research facilities. It acts as the National Distributed Centre combining regional and federal contributions to the European LifeWatch ERIC infrastructure.
Key services
Biodiversity observatory automation, Taxonomic services, Species occurrence services, Biogeographic services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Matomo Analytics, JavaScript, CSS, SVG graphics
Frameworks
Drupal CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms
  2. Uses Drupal 10 CMS with modern web technologies
  3. Strong focus on biodiversity and ecosystem research services
  4. Clear privacy and cookie compliance mechanisms implemented
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. No terms of service page detected
  7. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact form and social media used
  8. Multiple external links to reputable scientific data services and partners
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Drupal 10 CMS with a modern tech stack including JavaScript and SVG graphics. It integrates Matomo analytics for privacy-respecting user tracking. The site is moderately performant with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The hosting is linked to BELNET, a reputable Belgian academic network provider. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured navigation. There is room for improvement in security headers and formal security documentation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lifewatch.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lifewatch.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.