Skip to main content

Security report for liferay.com

Liferay, Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Liferay, Inc. operates a leading digital experience platform (DXP) that empowers enterprises to build and manage web portals, intranets, and websites with integrated content management and collaboration features. The company targets large organizations seeking customizable and scalable digital experience solutions. Their market position is strong as an established open source and enterprise software provider with a comprehensive platform offering. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including React and Alloy UI, built on the Liferay DXP framework. The site demonstrates good performance and mobile optimization, with professional design and clear navigation. Analytics and consent management are implemented using Google Tag Manager and OneTrust, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses nonce-based Content Security Policy for inline scripts, indicating good security hygiene. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, some security headers could be more explicitly defined, and no public security.txt or incident response information was found. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with a solid security posture and compliance awareness. The absence of WHOIS data for the www subdomain is likely a registrar artifact and does not detract from legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header coverage, publishing vulnerability disclosure and incident response details, and improving accessibility compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of liferay.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liferay.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
75
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention liferay.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5,794
Employees
56
Customers
3,391
Third parties
2,347
Weak passwords
28%

Latest record dated 2026-06-17 · 42 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for liferay.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –liferay.com2026-06-17
  • –evp.liferay.com2026-06-06
  • –reviews.liferay.com2026-06-06
  • –login.liferay.com2026-06-06
  • –web.liferay.com2026-06-06

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Liferay is positioned as a key player in the enterprise digital experience market, offering a platform that integrates portal, content management, and workflow capabilities. Their business model focuses on software licensing, support, and professional services targeting medium to large enterprises. The company benefits from a strong open source community and a global customer base. Partnerships and integrations with major technology providers enhance their ecosystem. Growth indicators include active analytics usage and comprehensive privacy compliance, signaling ongoing investment in digital maturity and customer trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Content Security Policy with nonce, and cookie consent management aligned with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security.txt and incident response pages suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Security headers such as X-Frame-Options and Referrer-Policy are not explicitly visible and should be confirmed or added. Overall, the site balances security and usability well but could enhance its security culture visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  2. Add explicit security headers including X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy.
  3. Create and publish an incident response policy page with contact channels for security issues.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Liferay, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Liferay, Inc.
Description
Liferay provides a digital experience platform (DXP) that enables enterprises to build web portals, websites, and intranets with integrated content management, collaboration, and workflow capabilities.
Key services
Liferay DXP platform, Portal and content management, Collaboration tools, Workflow and integration services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, AUI (Alloy UI), YUI, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Liferay Portal Framework, JavaScript ES Modules
Frameworks
Liferay DXP, AUI, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of nonce for inline scripts
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Liferay Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Liferay Analytics
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data for www.liferay.com subdomain is missing, but main domain is legitimate.
  3. Site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and Liferay DXP platform.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  5. No explicit security.txt or incident response pages found.
  6. Site uses Google Tag Manager and Liferay Analytics for tracking.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in HTML.
  8. Site design and navigation are professional and consistent.
  9. Contact information including emails, phone, and forms are available.
  10. Security headers partially present; could improve with additional headers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Liferay DXP platform using React and Alloy UI frameworks, indicating a modern and modular architecture. The use of Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for analytics and consent management reflects a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Performance is moderate with combined and minified resources, though some legacy YUI components are still present. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and partial security header implementation, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liferay.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liferay.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.