Skip to main content

Security report for lifecoala.cz

Projekt LIFE COALA · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Projekt LIFE COALA is a government-backed environmental initiative focused on increasing climate resilience and sustainable development in the Moravian-Silesian region of the Czech Republic. The project is co-financed by the European Union LIFE program and involves multiple regional government and institutional partners. The website provides detailed information about project activities, partners, events, and public engagement efforts. The target audience includes local residents, farmers, public authorities, and stakeholders interested in climate adaptation. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates Matomo analytics for privacy-conscious user tracking. The site is mobile optimized, accessible, and well-structured with good SEO practices. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident, and performance is moderate. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and secure forms but lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for GDPR compliance. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, though the EU co-financing and partner ecosystem provide strong legitimacy signals. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and serves its public mission well. Strategic improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and domain registration transparency would enhance its security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lifecoala.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project operates in the government and non-profit sectors, focusing on environmental sustainability and climate adaptation. It benefits from strong partnerships with regional governments, ministries, universities, and research institutes, which enhances its credibility and resource base. The business model is grant-funded, primarily through the EU LIFE program, with a clear focus on public benefit rather than commercial revenue. The website supports outreach and education, targeting a broad audience including farmers and the general public. Growth indicators include active event programming and ongoing public engagement. The partnership ecosystem is robust, spanning multiple municipalities and institutions, which supports project goals and regional impact.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The use of HTTPS and secure forms is positive, but the lack of security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and cookie consent mechanisms are gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency and readiness perception. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a privacy policy, but cookie consent is missing. No exposed credentials or vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. The security culture appears basic but could be improved with formal policies and disclosures. Overall, the site is secure enough for its informational purpose but should enhance compliance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR requirements.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and contact information for security issues to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Create and host a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information to improve trust and legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Moravskoslezský kraj
VAT number
CZ70890692
Registration number
70890692
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Projekt LIFE COALA
Description
Projekt LIFE COALA is a European Union co-financed initiative aimed at increasing climate resilience in the Moravian-Silesian region, improving living environment quality, and supporting sustainable regional development.
Key services
Climate resilience activities, Educational events, Consulting for farmers, Public awareness and engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Matomo Analytics, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with email input and consent notice

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  3. Site uses Matomo analytics hosted on a regional domain, indicating privacy-conscious tracking.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism found despite GDPR policy presence.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies published.
  6. Clear business and project information with multiple institutional partners.
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on main pages; contact via form and physical address only.
  8. No terms of service or incident response information found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  10. Site is well structured, mobile optimized, and accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It uses Matomo analytics hosted on a regional domain, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. The site loads multiple deferred JavaScript files for UI enhancements such as smooth scrolling and swiper sliders. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with font size controls and ARIA labels. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate, with optimized images and lazy loading used. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and cookie consent are missing, representing modernization opportunities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lifecoala.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lifecoala.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.