Skip to main content

Security report for lietovelreiz.lv

Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Lieto vēlreiz' is a Latvian platform promoting sustainable consumption through renting, repairing, sharing, and exchanging goods. It targets Latvian-speaking consumers interested in reducing waste and saving money by reusing items. The site is professionally designed with good content quality and consistent branding, though explicit business details and contact information are not provided. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript modules, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, Facebook Pixel for marketing, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with good accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site is fully accessible. The domain registration is privacy protected, limiting transparency, but the use of reputable third-party services and professional content suggests moderate legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well on content, technical implementation, security, and privacy compliance, but business credibility is limited by lack of contact and company information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lietovelreiz.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lietovelreiz.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lietovelreiz.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates in the sharing economy sector, focusing on reuse and sustainability. Its business model likely revolves around facilitating peer-to-peer or community-based exchanges and rentals. The target audience is environmentally conscious consumers in Latvia. The site integrates major marketing and analytics tools, indicating an intent to grow and engage users effectively. However, absence of detailed company information and contact channels may limit trust and user confidence. The partnership ecosystem includes Cookiebot, Meta Platforms, and Google, which support compliance and marketing efforts. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the platform's focus on sustainability aligns with current market trends. Strategic observations suggest the need for enhanced transparency and user engagement features to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with blocking mode enabled, ensuring GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a gap in best practices. There is no published security policy or incident response information, nor a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. These omissions could impact incident handling and user trust. The integration of third-party marketing and analytics tools introduces tracking but is managed with user consent. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved by adopting additional headers and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and provide a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Add explicit and verified contact information including business address, phone, and email to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party integrations to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize tracking risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Lieto Vēlreiz - iespējas lietas nomāt, remontēt, koplietot un samainīt. Tā samazināsim vajadzību pirkt jaunu, ietaupīsim naudu un radīsim mazāk atkritumu.
Key services
Renting items, Repairing items, Sharing items, Exchanging items
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, Cookiebot, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with blocking mode
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management
  2. Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager are integrated for marketing and analytics
  3. No explicit contact information or business registration details found on the site
  4. No terms of service or security policy pages detected
  5. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  6. Content is in Latvian language targeting local reuse and sharing economy
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected, site fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript module-based architecture with multiple asynchronously loaded scripts and CSS files, indicating a modular and performant frontend design. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, and Facebook Pixel along with Google Tag Manager are used for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and descriptions. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance appears moderate with loading spinners indicating dynamic content loading. Technical debt is minimal but could be reduced by consolidating scripts and enhancing security headers. Modernization opportunities include adding progressive web app features and improving accessibility compliance. Technical risks are low but depend on maintaining third-party service integrations and compliance with evolving privacy laws.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lietovelreiz.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lietovelreiz.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.