Skip to main content

Security report for liesma.com

TDA Liesma · Other · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TDA Liesma is a cultural organization dedicated to preserving and promoting Latvian stage dance traditions, with a history spanning over sixty years. The website serves as an informational platform showcasing the organization's legacy and ongoing activities. The business operates primarily in the cultural and performing arts sector, targeting a general audience interested in Latvian dance heritage. The domain has been registered since 2008, reflecting a stable online presence consistent with the organization's history. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Nicepage plugin, incorporating jQuery and Google Analytics (though the latter is not fully configured). The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation. Hosting is provided by Datucentrs, a Latvian hosting provider. However, some technical improvements are recommended, including enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers to enhance security posture. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration but lacks important security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The absence of contact emails and phone numbers on the site reduces direct communication channels for users and security reporting. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and focused on cultural content with no adult or questionable material. The main risks relate to privacy compliance and security best practices, which should be addressed to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liesma.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TDA Liesma operates in the cultural sector, focusing on Latvian stage dance. The organization likely relies on community engagement, performances, and cultural preservation activities. The website targets enthusiasts and supporters of Latvian dance traditions. The business model appears to be non-commercial or non-profit oriented, emphasizing cultural heritage rather than direct revenue generation. The long domain age and consistent branding indicate a stable market position within its niche. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube supports outreach and audience engagement. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content or WHOIS data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are important to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are provided, limiting the organization's ability to handle security incidents effectively. Google Analytics is present but not fully configured, potentially leading to incomplete or inaccurate data collection. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Configure Google Analytics properly or remove unused tracking scripts to avoid unnecessary data collection.
  5. Establish and publish vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information to improve security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TDA Liesma
Description
„Liesmas” biogrāfija sešdesmit gadu garumā ir pasakaini skaistu mirkļu virknējums, kam ir paliekoša vieta latviešu skatuves dejas vēsturē. „Liesma” – lepnā un cēlā, latviski elegantā, ziemeļnieciski atturīgā un reizē azartiskā un spožā. Jā, arī drosmīgā „Liesma”, kas joprojām kopj gan latviešu, gan cittautu skatuves dejas tradīciju un apliecina.
Key services
Latvian stage dance tradition preservation and performance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics (not fully configured), Nicepage
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a cultural organization site focused on Latvian stage dance.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with Nicepage plugin for design.
  5. Google Analytics is included but not fully configured.
  6. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. Domain registration is stable and long-standing.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Nicepage plugin, using jQuery and Google Fonts. Hosting is provided by Datucentrs, a Latvian hosting provider. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and website schema. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers. The Google Analytics script is included but not fully configured, which may affect analytics accuracy. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small cultural organization but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liesma.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liesma.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.