Skip to main content

Security report for liepajaspapirs.lv

AS Liepājas Papīrs · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AS Liepājas Papīrs is a well-established Latvian manufacturing company specializing in customized label and sticker printing services. With over 125 years of experience, the company offers a full service from design and layout to printing, post-processing, and delivery. Their market position is strong with over 500 international clients and a certified environmental management system, indicating a mature and reputable business. The website targets businesses requiring personalized labeling solutions and emphasizes quality and service completeness. Technically, the website employs modern analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, alongside a map integration using OpenLayers. The CMS appears to be MODX Evolution, and the site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data, though accessibility could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements Google reCAPTCHA v2 on its contact form, which is positive. However, no security headers were detected, and there is no visible cookie consent mechanism or comprehensive privacy policy linked, which are areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with a solid business foundation. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security headers would enhance its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liepajaspapirs.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on label and sticker printing with a full-service approach. Its long history and international client base provide competitive advantages. The business model centers on B2B services with design, printing, and delivery as revenue streams. The website content and social media presence support brand visibility and customer engagement. Partnerships with webbuilding.lv for development indicate a professional digital ecosystem. Growth indicators include a large employee base and certified environmental management, suggesting operational maturity and sustainability focus.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and anti-spam measures like reCAPTCHA are in place. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, indicating gaps in security governance. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking cookie consent and detailed privacy policies. No critical vulnerabilities or data exposures were detected, but improvements in security best practices and compliance are recommended to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and ePrivacy Directive.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages with clear links in the footer.
  4. Establish an incident response contact email (e.g., security@ or abuse@) and publish vulnerability disclosure guidelines.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AS Liepājas Papīrs
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AS Liepājas Papīrs
Description
Uzlīmju un etiķešu druka, kas ietver pilnu pakalpojumu servisu - dizaina izstrādi un maketēšanu, filmu un iespiedformu izgatavošanu, apdrukāta materiāla pēcapstrādi, produkcijas piegādi klientam.
Key services
Design, Printing and post-processing, Delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, OpenLayers (map library), jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA v2 on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages linked in footer or header
  3. Contact form uses Google reCAPTCHA v2 for spam protection
  4. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube
  5. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML content
  7. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and business consistency
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and OpenLayers for maps. The CMS is MODX Evolution, which is somewhat dated but functional. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and Open Graph data. Mobile optimization is basic but present. Technical debt may exist due to older CMS and lack of advanced security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize the platform, improve accessibility, and enhance security configurations to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liepajaspapirs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liepajaspapirs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.