Skip to main content

Security report for liedesmezi.lv

SIA "Liedes meži" · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Liedes meži is a small Latvian forestry service provider specializing in forest taxation, inventory, young stand care, marking, staking, and consulting. The company positions itself as an independent forestry expert team with certified taxators and experienced forestry workers, targeting forest owners and managers in Latvia. The website is hosted on the Blogger platform with Google hosting and uses standard web technologies including JavaScript and Google Charts. While the site provides clear contact information and a cookie consent banner, it lacks privacy and terms of service pages, and does not implement advanced security headers. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but could improve accessibility and SEO. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing key headers. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is functional and professional for a small niche business but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liedesmezi.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
35
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention liedesmezi.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for liedesmezi.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche forestry consulting and operational services market in Latvia, serving forest owners who require expert advice and management services. Its business model is service-oriented, relying on certified expertise and practical forestry work. The website content and structure indicate a focus on trust and professionalism, though the lack of detailed corporate information and certifications limits broader market positioning. The company uses Google Blogger for web presence, indicating a small to medium scale operation with limited digital infrastructure investment. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are linked. The contact details and service descriptions suggest a direct client engagement model without e-commerce or complex digital transactions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent banner indicating some privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web threats. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The contact form collects user data but lacks visible anti-spam or security controls. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is low risk but could improve security maturity by implementing recommended headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to broaden user reach and comply with best practices.
  4. Establish an incident response contact channel and publish a security policy to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Liedes meži"
Description
Provides forest management services including forest taxation, inventory, young stand care, marking and staking. Independent forestry experts with certified forest taxators and experienced forestry workers.
Key services
Forest taxation, Forest inventory, Young stand care, Marking and staking, Consultations, Forest management project preparation
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Blogger platform, Google Charts, Google Adsense, JavaScript, CSS
Platforms
Blogger
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is hosted on Blogger platform with Google hosting and scripts.
  2. Content is in Latvian language focused on forestry services.
  3. Contact information including phone and email is clearly provided.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  6. No advanced security headers detected.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Website is not mobile responsive beyond basic level.
  10. No social media links explicitly found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Blogger platform, leveraging Google hosting and standard web technologies such as JavaScript and CSS. It uses Google Charts for graphical data representation and Google Adsense for advertising. The site is not fully responsive but provides basic mobile support. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no advanced structured data beyond minimal schema.org Blog markup. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The lack of advanced security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. The WHOIS data is not available due to query limits, which restricts domain age and ownership verification.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liedesmezi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liedesmezi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.