Skip to main content

Security report for liebherr.com

Liebherr Group · Manufacturing · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Liebherr Group is a globally recognized enterprise specializing in manufacturing construction machinery, cranes, refrigeration appliances, and related services. With over 50,000 employees and a presence in more than 50 countries, the company maintains a strong market position as one of the largest construction machine manufacturers worldwide. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and consistent branding aimed at industrial and commercial customers across multiple sectors including construction, mining, maritime, and aerospace. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and is hosted on Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. However, a critical security gap exists due to an invalid or missing SSL certificate, resulting in no active HTTPS support, which significantly impacts the security posture. Privacy compliance is well addressed with visible cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies. Overall, the site demonstrates high business credibility but requires urgent remediation of SSL/TLS issues to ensure secure user interactions.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of liebherr.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liebherr.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate liebherr.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
39
Registered
39
Resolving
39
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-07-28

Masked preview

  • li••••••.comMediumbitsquatting
  • li•••••.comMediumomission
  • li••••••.comLowbitsquatting

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of liebherr.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Liebherr Group operates a diversified manufacturing business model with a strong emphasis on quality engineering and global service networks. Its competitive advantage lies in its family-run heritage, extensive product portfolio, and international footprint. Revenue streams are primarily from product sales, after-sales services, and used equipment marketplaces. The target audience includes industrial clients in construction, mining, and transportation sectors. Growth indicators include strategic partnerships and continuous innovation in product solutions. The company maintains a robust partnership ecosystem with payment processors and marketing platforms, enhancing operational efficiency and customer engagement.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate but compromised by the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, exposing users to potential risks of data interception. Security headers are well implemented, including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which mitigate common web vulnerabilities. Privacy policies and consent management are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file indicates room for improvement in transparency and incident response readiness. The business impact of the SSL issue is significant, potentially undermining user trust and compliance with data protection regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Renew and properly configure SSL/TLS certificates to enable HTTPS and support modern TLS versions.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to enhance security and performance.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and establish a clear vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update Content Security Policy to minimize allowed external sources.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility, including verified company emails and phone numbers, to improve trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Next.js and uses Cloudflare for CDN and security services. It employs a pattern library for UI components and integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Usercentrics CMP. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic due to the presence of a noindex meta tag, possibly intentional for regional or staging purposes. The invalid SSL configuration is a critical technical debt that must be addressed to avoid security risks and improve user confidence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liebherr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liebherr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.