Skip to main content

Security report for lfb.it

Luigi F. Bona · Other · Italy

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.lfb.it is a personal or small-scale cultural site managed by Luigi F. Bona, focusing on artistic and historical content related to Italy and Europe, with references to the year 1968 and various cultural themes. The site appears to serve a niche audience interested in cultural heritage and non-profit organizations, with no evident commercial business model or large-scale operations. The website content is basic and primarily informational, with links to related cultural and non-profit entities. From a technical perspective, the website uses older web technologies including XHTML 1.0 Transitional and iso-8859-1 charset. It includes basic CSS and JavaScript, notably a ShinyStat analytics script for visitor tracking. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks and shows limited mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate but could benefit from modernization. Security posture is weak, with no evidence of HTTPS or security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no contact or incident response information. The site does not appear to collect personal data via forms or other means, but the lack of security best practices and compliance documentation is a concern. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected, and the site is safe for general audiences. Overall, the website is low risk but would benefit from implementing HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, improving technical infrastructure, and providing clear contact and security information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lfb.it

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lfb.it, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lfb.it right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a personal or cultural project by Luigi F. Bona, with a focus on Italian and European cultural themes. It operates in the 'Other' industry category, likely as a non-commercial or hobbyist site. The market positioning is niche, targeting cultural enthusiasts and non-profit supporters. There is no evidence of revenue streams or commercial partnerships beyond links to non-profit organizations. The business model appears informational and archival. The site has a small scale and long history since 2000, indicating stability but limited growth or modernization. Partnerships with cultural and non-profit entities are evident through external links. The lack of modern digital marketing or e-commerce features suggests limited commercial ambitions.

Security posture

The website's security posture is minimal. There is no indication of HTTPS usage or security headers, which exposes users to potential risks in data transmission. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The site does not appear to collect user data via forms, reducing exposure but also limiting user engagement. The use of ShinyStat analytics implies some user tracking without visible consent mechanisms. Overall, the site lacks modern security best practices and compliance measures, representing a moderate security risk primarily due to outdated technology and missing protections.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS across the entire website to secure data transmission and improve user trust.
  2. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data collection.
  3. Add clear contact information including email and phone to enhance business credibility and support.
  4. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve security posture.
  5. Modernize the website's technical stack to improve mobile responsiveness, accessibility, and performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Luigi F. Bona
Description
Personal or small-scale website related to Luigi F. Bona, featuring cultural and artistic content including references to Italy, Europe, 1968, schools, universal exhibitions, magazines, and fandom.
Key services
Cultural content presentation, Artistic and historical references, Links to related cultural and non-profit organizations
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML 4/Transitional (XHTML 1.0 Transitional), CSS, JavaScript, ShinyStat analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
ShinyStat
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ShinyStat
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal/cultural site with minimal commercial or business focus.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or forms detected.
  4. Uses outdated charset iso-8859-1 and older HTML standards.
  5. Includes external links to non-profit and cultural organizations.
  6. Includes ShinyStat analytics script for visitor tracking.
  7. No HTTPS or security headers information available from provided data.
  8. No social media links or modern marketing tools detected.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy web technologies including XHTML 1.0 Transitional and iso-8859-1 charset, which are outdated by modern standards. CSS and JavaScript are minimal, with a third-party analytics script (ShinyStat) included asynchronously. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern frameworks. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate but could be improved by updating the tech stack and optimizing assets. No hosting provider or SSL certificate information was detected from the provided data. The site structure is simple with basic navigation and limited interactivity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lfb.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lfb.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.