Skip to main content

Security report for lesycr.cz

Lesy České republiky, s. p. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lesy České republiky, s. p. is a Czech state enterprise responsible for managing over 1.2 million hectares of state forest property and extensive watercourses. It operates under the Ministry of Agriculture and holds a leading position in forestry management within the Czech Republic. The website provides comprehensive information and services for the general public, professional forestry community, and business partners, including timber sales, hunting lease management, and public education. The company maintains a strong digital presence with multilingual support and active social media channels. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, hosted on Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, cookie consent management, and integration of security monitoring tools. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with clear contact information and official company details. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected, and the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating high legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of lesycr.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lesycr.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a government entity managing natural resources, with a business model focused on sustainable forestry, watercourse management, and public engagement. It leverages partnerships with community programs and uses digital platforms for auctions and public contracts. The enterprise is large-scale with a well-established market position and a clear organizational structure including subsidiaries like the Semenářský závod. The website content and linked domains reflect a mature ecosystem supporting forestry, environmental sustainability, and public services. Growth indicators include active public outreach, educational programs, and strategic development plans. The company benefits from trust signals such as official certifications, government affiliation, and transparent policies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. Use of security monitoring (Sentry) indicates proactive incident detection. However, some standard security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected and could be improved. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. The absence of a published security.txt or explicit incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in vulnerability disclosure and incident management transparency. Overall, the security practices align with good standards for a government-affiliated website.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Enhance visibility of incident response contacts or dedicated security email addresses to improve readiness and trust.
  4. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core and plugins to mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Lesy České republiky, s. p.
VAT number
CZ42196451
Registration number
42196451
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lesy České republiky, s. p.
Description
Podnik Lesy České republiky, s. p., obhospodařuje více než 1,2 mil. ha státního lesního majetku a 38 tis. km vodních toků a bystřin. Sídlí v Hradci Králové.
Key services
Forest management, Watercourse management, Timber sales, Public education and outreach, Hunting lease management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, CookieYes Consent Management
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring (Sentry integration)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with consent management.
  3. Clear contact information with official company details.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. Strong alignment between WHOIS data and website content.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization. It uses Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. Hosting is supported by Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure, indicating reliable and scalable hosting. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in loading speed. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional and user-friendly experience. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and implement additional performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lesycr.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lesycr.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.