Skip to main content

Security report for lesrapacesdegap.fr

Les Rapaces de Gap · Other · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Les Rapaces de Gap is a professional ice hockey club based in France, actively participating in the Ligue Magnus. The website serves as the primary digital presence for the club, offering news, ticketing, merchandise, and event information to fans and the local community. The site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and SportsPress, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Social media integration is strong, enhancing fan engagement. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though the absence of security headers and a privacy policy page are notable gaps. The missing WHOIS data reduces domain trust slightly but does not detract from the legitimacy of the club's online presence. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and serves its business purpose effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lesrapacesdegap.fr

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The club operates in the sports sector, focusing on professional ice hockey. Its business model includes ticket sales, merchandising, and event promotion. The website targets fans and local supporters, providing timely updates and engagement opportunities. Partnerships with the Ligue Magnus and an official merchandise store indicate a well-established ecosystem. The site’s content and branding are consistent, supporting a strong market position within its niche. Growth potential lies in expanding digital engagement and improving compliance and security transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page limits the site's incident response readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but should be enhanced to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a detailed privacy policy page outlining data collection, processing, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add explicit contact information for security incidents and consider a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain a robust security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Les Rapaces de Gap
Description
Suivez l'actualité, les transferts, les évènements, les abonnements et bien plus encore du Club professionnel des Rapaces de Gap.
Key services
Professional ice hockey team information, Ticket sales (billetterie), Merchandise sales (boutique), Event calendar, Team roster and training center info
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, SportsPress plugin, Custom Facebook Feed plugin, SuperPWA plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Custom Facebook Feed
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional sports club site for Les Rapaces de Gap ice hockey team.
  2. Content is rich with news, events, ticketing, and social media integration.
  3. No privacy policy page explicitly found, but cookie consent is implemented.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and may indicate privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  5. Website uses modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  6. No obvious security issues or vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage content.
  8. Social media presence is strong with Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn links.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, leveraging popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization, WPBakery Page Builder for layout management, and SportsPress for sports-specific content management. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes a Progressive Web App manifest for enhanced mobile experience. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The absence of detailed hosting information limits full infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical stack is modern and suitable for the site's purpose but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lesrapacesdegap.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lesrapacesdegap.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.