Skip to main content

Security report for les-scop-hautsdefrance.coop

URSCOP Hauts-de-France · Other · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

URSCOP Hauts-de-France is a regional cooperative union dedicated to supporting the creation, development, and transmission of cooperative enterprises (Scop and Scic) within the Hauts de France region. The organization offers consulting services, training certified by Qualiopi, and territorial anchoring to assist cooperative entrepreneurs. Their market position is that of a regional leader in cooperative business support, targeting entrepreneurs and project holders interested in cooperative business models. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies including FontAwesome, Animate.css, Google Analytics (deferred until consent), and Elfsight widgets for enhanced user experience. The site is hosted by Gandi SAS with HTTPS enforced, though DNSSEC is not enabled. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and basic accessibility features. SEO is basic but sufficient for the site's scope. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS, domain transfer protection, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, it lacks advanced security headers and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data aligns well with the website content, indicating legitimacy and consistency. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for URSCOP Hauts-de-France with good business credibility and privacy compliance. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing a security policy, and implementing a vulnerability disclosure process to enhance security posture further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching les-scop-hautsdefrance.coop

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

URSCOP Hauts-de-France operates in the cooperative business support sector, focusing on Scop and Scic enterprises. Their competitive advantage lies in regional specialization and certification (Qualiopi) for training services. The business model revolves around consulting, training, and territorial support, targeting cooperative entrepreneurs and project holders in Hauts de France. Revenue streams likely include training fees and membership contributions. The partnership ecosystem includes communication agencies (e.g., SDM Communication) and technology providers (Elfsight). The organization is relatively new (founded 2023) but well-positioned regionally with clear branding and trust signals.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection active. Cookie consent is implemented with user control, and Google Analytics tracking is disabled by default until consent. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies indicates room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are visible, which could impact readiness for security events. Data protection practices appear compliant with GDPR, but explicit DPO contact information is missing. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but should be enhanced to mitigate emerging threats and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
URSCOP Hauts-de-France
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
URSCOP Hauts-de-France
Description
Union régionale accompagnant les Scop et Scic dans la création, reprise, transmission et développement d'entreprises coopératives dans la région Hauts de France.
Key services
Conseil en création et développement de Scop et Scic, Formations certifiées Qualiopi, Accompagnement territorial
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
FontAwesome, Animate.css, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Elfsight widgets, Tarteaucitron cookie manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (GA4)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (GA4)
Marketing tools
Elfsight widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via tarteaucitron with clear user controls.
  3. No privacy policy page explicitly titled but legal mentions page likely contains privacy info.
  4. No terms of service page found.
  5. Contact info includes phone and physical address but no email contact found in visible content.
  6. Use of modern front-end libraries and external widgets for enhanced UI.
  7. Google Analytics is present but disabled by default until user consent.
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  9. Website is professionally designed and well-branded with consistent logos and messaging.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a combination of standard web technologies and third-party widgets (Elfsight) to provide interactive content. It uses FontAwesome for icons and Animate.css for animations, indicating a modern front-end approach. Google Analytics is integrated but respects user consent via tarteaucitron cookie management. The CMS appears to be a proprietary or less common platform (monsite.link). Hosting is provided by Gandi SAS, a reputable registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with some external dependencies. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is basic. SEO metadata is present but minimal. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with les-scop-hautsdefrance.coop. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review les-scop-hautsdefrance.coop.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.