LeoVegas Mobile Gaming Group is a prominent player in the mobile casino and iGaming industry, with a strong European footprint and a workforce exceeding 900 employees. The company emphasizes innovation, diversity, and a collaborative culture to maintain its market leadership. Their careers page highlights multiple departments and locations, reflecting a broad operational scope. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern JavaScript libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks explicit security policies and incident response contacts. Overall, the site is professional, well-branded, and trustworthy, with room for improvement in security transparency and accessibility.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
No HTTPS encryption
GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data
What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
61
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention leovegascareers.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for leovegascareers.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
LeoVegas Group operates in the technology sector, specifically focusing on mobile gaming and casino services. Their business model revolves around delivering innovative iGaming experiences through multiple brands and subsidiaries. The company targets job seekers interested in the gaming industry and maintains a strong brand portfolio including BetMGM, BetUK, and Royal Panda among others. Their partnership ecosystem includes responsible gaming and whistleblowing services, enhancing corporate responsibility. The company’s market position as a leader in mobile casino gaming is supported by a large employee base and multiple European locations, indicating growth and operational scale.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent banners, and privacy policies aligned with GDPR. However, it lacks visible security policies and incident response contact details, which are important for transparency and trust. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. The use of Google Tag Manager is configured with consent defaults to deny ad and analytics storage, reflecting privacy-conscious practices. Security headers were not explicitly detected in the provided data, suggesting an area for enhancement. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from improved documentation and header implementation.
Recommendations
Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and controls.
Add explicit incident response and abuse contact information to improve transparency.
Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
Enhance website accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards.
Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
LeoVegas Mobile Gaming Group
Description
LeoVegas Mobile Gaming Group is a leader in the mobile casino business focused on creating the world’s greatest iGaming experience. The company emphasizes innovation, diversity, inclusion, and a culture based on trust, accountability, and teamwork. It employs over 900 people across Europe and offers a variety of career opportunities in multiple departments and locations.
Key services
Mobile casino gaming, iGaming platform services, Career opportunities in various departments
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
jQuery, GSAP, Leaflet, Vimeo Player, Splide.js, FancyBox, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Cookie consent mechanism implemented
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Use of Google Tag Manager with consent set to deny ad and analytics storage by default
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
Content is focused on careers and company culture.
Strong emphasis on diversity, inclusion, and employee growth.
Multiple locations and departments listed for job opportunities.
Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the careers page.
Social media presence is active and linked.
No visible security policy or incident response contact information.
Use of modern JavaScript libraries and WordPress CMS.
No signs of malicious content or phishing.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress CMS and uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, GSAP for animations, Leaflet for maps, Vimeo for video content, and Splide.js for sliders. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags with privacy settings configured. The site loads resources from reputable CDNs, ensuring performance and reliability. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some deferred scripts and lazy loading implemented. Technical debt appears low, but accessibility could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the data.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with leovegascareers.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leovegascareers.com.