Skip to main content

Security report for leneo.io

Leneo · Technology · Denmark

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leneo is a Denmark-based company offering a comprehensive B2B recurring billing and contract management platform tailored for financial, industrial, and technology sectors. Their solution aims to eliminate revenue leakage and reduce manual workloads by automating billing, contract lifecycle management, and integrating seamlessly with existing enterprise systems. The platform supports multiple billing models including subscriptions, usage-based, and leasing, and provides features such as asset management, CPQ, reporting, and IoT-compatible billing. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks like Next.js and React, with Chakra UI for styling, and integrates Matomo analytics and HubSpot forms for marketing and data collection. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though some security headers are missing and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published. The WHOIS data is incomplete, lacking registrar and registrant details, which slightly reduces trustworthiness but the professional website and clear contact information mitigate concerns. Overall, Leneo presents a credible and professional digital presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leneo.io

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Leneo targets B2B companies across multiple industries, positioning itself as a versatile recurring revenue management solution. Their business model is SaaS-based, focusing on recurring billing and contract management with value-added services like CPQ and workflow automation. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with well-known platforms such as Salesforce, Zendesk, and Dynamics 365, enhancing its ecosystem. The presence of a dedicated portal and LinkedIn profile indicates active business operations. The company appears small-sized with a focus on growth and customer-centric solutions. The lack of detailed WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or registry limitations, common in tech startups or SaaS providers. The website content and structure reflect a mature marketing approach aimed at decision-makers in finance, industrial, and tech sectors.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms via HubSpot, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No security policy or incident response information is published, which is a compliance and trust shortfall. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file limits transparency and responsiveness to security issues. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional headers, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with privacy regulations given the use of tracking and analytics.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly review and update WHOIS information to ensure domain registration transparency and enhance legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Registration number
CVR: 37648035
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Leneo
Description
Leneo provides a B2B recurring billing and contract management platform designed to stop revenue leakage and reduce manual workload. It supports various billing models including subscriptions, usage-based, and leasing, and integrates with existing business systems.
Key services
Recurring billing, Contract management, Configure Price Quote (CPQ), Asset management, Reporting and dashboards, Integrations and API, Workflow automation, IoT compatible billing, Bank reporting, Special Purpose Vehicle handling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Chakra UI, Matomo Analytics, HubSpot Forms
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms (HubSpot)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. WHOIS data is incomplete and malformed, limiting domain trust analysis.
  4. Privacy policy and terms of service are present and comprehensive.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking and forms.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, address, and contact form.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  8. Integration with Matomo analytics and HubSpot forms for marketing and data collection.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Next.js and React, providing server-side rendering and good performance. Chakra UI is used for consistent styling and responsive design, ensuring good mobile optimization. Integration with Matomo analytics and HubSpot forms indicates a mature marketing and data collection approach. The site loads multiple JavaScript chunks asynchronously, which may impact initial load times but improves interactivity. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Accessibility is basic but present, with room for improvement. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with opportunities to enhance performance and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leneo.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leneo.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.