Skip to main content

Security report for lena.app

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website lena.app is a platform focused on providing family-friendly outing suggestions, targeting families with children. The content is primarily in German and offers a simple, quick way to find suitable excursions for families. The site uses modern web technologies including React and Material-UI, and integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Hotjar for user behavior tracking. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. No contact information or business registration details are provided, limiting transparency. Security headers are minimal but include a Content-Security-Policy to block mixed content, indicating some attention to security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lena.app

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LENA positions itself as a niche service for families looking for suitable outings, leveraging interest matching to enhance user experience. The platform likely generates value through user engagement and possibly advertising or partnerships, though no direct monetization details are visible. The absence of contact or legal information limits trust signals. The use of Google Analytics and Hotjar suggests a focus on user behavior analysis to optimize offerings. The market segment is family leisure and local tourism, a competitive but specialized niche. Growth potential depends on content quality and user acquisition, but current content quality is basic. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate with some positive indicators such as the use of Content-Security-Policy to block mixed content and the presence of HTTPS implied by external script sources. However, the lack of additional security headers, absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicate gaps in compliance and security maturity. Tracking scripts are present without visible consent mechanisms, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security policies, transparency, and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add clear contact information including email and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  3. Enhance security headers by adding Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact channels to improve security posture.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any vulnerable libraries or exposed data.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Einfach. Schnell. Passende Ausflüge für Deine Familie.
Key services
family outing suggestions, trip ideas, interest matching for outings
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (implied by chunk.js and jss styles), Google Analytics, Hotjar, Polyfill.io
Frameworks
Material-UI (Mui styles detected)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Content-Security-Policy to block mixed content

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found in HTML content.
  2. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  3. No forms detected on the main page for user input or contact.
  4. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries but lacks visible business or security documentation.
  5. Security headers are minimal but include a Content-Security-Policy to block mixed content.
  6. Tracking and analytics scripts from Google Analytics and Hotjar are present without visible cookie consent.
  7. No social media links or company legal information found in the HTML content.
  8. Website content is in German language targeting families looking for outing suggestions.
  9. No visible security or incident response policies or certifications.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, likely React, with Material-UI for styling. It uses polyfills for browser compatibility and integrates Google Analytics and Hotjar for user tracking. The site preloads fonts and uses DNS prefetch and preconnect hints to optimize resource loading. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices, though mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML. The site uses a Content-Security-Policy header to block mixed content, which is a positive security measure. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lena.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lena.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.