Skip to main content

Security report for lempire.com

lempire · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

lempire is a mature technology company offering a suite of SaaS products focused on sales and marketing automation, including cold email outreach, email deliverability, meeting scheduling, and social media personal branding tools. The company targets SMBs and sales teams globally, boasting over 125,000 users and a consistent brand presence. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies such as Webflow CMS, jQuery, and Swiper.js, with Cloudflare DNS hosting. While the site delivers excellent content quality, user experience, and SEO, its security posture is weakened by an invalid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, which poses a significant risk. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and user consent mechanisms. Overall, the business credibility is strong, supported by domain age, testimonials, and partner integrations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lempire.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
87
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

lempire operates in the competitive SaaS market with a diversified product portfolio addressing key pain points in sales and marketing workflows. Its business model relies on subscription-based SaaS offerings with a focus on user growth and engagement. The company leverages partnerships among its own product brands to create a cohesive ecosystem. The website content and domain registration data indicate a stable and legitimate business with a mature market presence. The absence of physical addresses or phone numbers suggests a primarily digital-first operation. Marketing and analytics tools are extensively used to optimize user acquisition and engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security best practices such as SPF and DMARC email authentication and HSTS header usage. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols critically undermine the security posture, exposing users to potential data interception and trust issues. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, indicating gaps in transparency and readiness. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts is balanced with user consent mechanisms, reflecting a moderate privacy compliance level. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues is essential to improve trust and security.

Recommendations

  1. Urgently fix the SSL certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user connections.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and implement OCSP stapling for improved SSL performance and security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Implement a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Continue to monitor and optimize privacy compliance, ensuring cookie consent mechanisms remain effective and transparent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on a modern infrastructure using Cloudflare DNS and Webflow CMS, leveraging popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 6.7 seconds and a page size of 227 KB, which could be optimized further. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured content. However, the lack of valid SSL and disabled TLS protocols represent significant technical risks. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools is well integrated with consent management. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but requires urgent security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lempire.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lempire.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.