Skip to main content

Security report for lempire.co

LEMPIRE · Technology · France

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lempire is a French-based technology company offering a suite of SaaS tools designed to help small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) enhance their sales and marketing efforts. Their product portfolio includes lemlist for cold email outreach, lemwarm for email deliverability, lemcal for meeting scheduling, Taplio for LinkedIn personal branding, and Tweet Hunter for Twitter audience growth. The company positions itself as a comprehensive solution provider for ambitious businesses aiming to scale their outreach and brand presence. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, jQuery, and Swiper JS, with good design quality and user experience. However, the security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS enforcement, which poses significant risks. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, while the business and technical maturity are strong, the security weaknesses require urgent remediation to protect user data and maintain trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lempire.co

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lempire.co, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lempire.co right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lempire operates in the competitive SaaS market targeting sales and marketing teams within SMBs. Their multi-product strategy allows cross-selling and ecosystem lock-in, enhancing customer lifetime value. The company has established a strong brand with over 125,000 users across its products and maintains active social media channels for engagement and marketing. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with a focus on user-friendly, AI-enhanced tools. Partnerships and sister domains indicate a cohesive product family. The company is relatively young (founded 2019) but has demonstrated rapid growth and market penetration. The absence of direct contact information on the main site suggests a digital-first, self-service approach. The WHOIS data confirms legitimacy and consistency with the brand identity.

Security posture

The website currently lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which is a critical security flaw exposing users to data interception risks. No security headers are detected, and advanced SSL features like HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption are absent. The domain has a DMARC policy set to quarantine, indicating some email security awareness. No subdomain takeover vulnerabilities were found. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of HTTPS and security headers significantly lowers the security posture score. There is no evidence of an incident response policy or security certifications. Immediate action is required to install and maintain proper SSL/TLS certificates and implement security best practices to protect users and data integrity.

Recommendations

  1. Install a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Implement HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  5. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Webflow CMS, jQuery, Swiper JS for sliders, and Lottie for animations, providing a rich and interactive user experience. Google Fonts and CDN services are used for performance optimization. The site has moderate load time and resource count, indicating room for optimization. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards are well implemented. However, the absence of HTTPS and security headers is a major technical risk. The site uses multiple external scripts for analytics and marketing, including Google Tag Manager, TikTok Pixel, Clearbit, and Intercom, which are integrated with cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but requires security enhancements and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lempire.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lempire.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.