Skip to main content

Security report for lelundin.org

Lundin & Bäcklund AB · Other · Sweden

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.lelundin.org is a specialized content platform managed by Lundin & Bäcklund AB, focusing on EU and NATO security policy, crisis management, and multilateral defense issues. It leverages the expertise of a former EU ambassador and provides a variety of content including blog posts, podcasts, reports, and educational materials targeting individuals interested in European security and defense topics. The site integrates multimedia content and links to authoritative external sources, enhancing its informational value. Technically, the site is built on the Weebly CMS platform, utilizing common web technologies such as jQuery, Google Analytics, and Font Awesome. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, though accessibility features are basic. SEO practices are adequately implemented with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes Google Analytics tracking. However, no explicit security headers or privacy/cookie policies were found, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is reasonable for this type of expert personal site but reduces transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected. Overall, the site is a credible and professional resource within its niche, but it would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, clearer contact information, and improved security headers to strengthen trust and user protection.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lelundin.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small expert content provider in the security and defense policy sector, primarily targeting academics, policymakers, and interested public audiences. Its competitive advantage lies in the authoritative background of the site owner and the comprehensive coverage of EU and NATO-related security topics. Revenue streams appear limited or indirect, possibly through consultancy or content sponsorships, as the site includes commerce elements but no explicit e-commerce products. The partnership with kkrva.se suggests collaboration with established defense research institutions. Growth indicators include active multimedia content and social media presence. The business ecosystem is focused on knowledge dissemination and policy influence rather than commercial sales.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data exposure is evident. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response information are provided, which limits preparedness transparency. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, potentially exposing the site to regulatory risks under GDPR. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational site but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve site security.
  3. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to enhance trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and analytics scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lundin & Bäcklund AB
Description
Former EU ambassador developing an EU and Security site focussing on comprehensive approaches - defence, multilateral (UN and OSCE), crisis response issues. Many geographic, thematic pages including on WMD, freedom and gender
Key services
Blog articles, Educational materials, Podcasts, Reports and seminar summaries, Downloadable publications
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, jQuery 1.8.3, Weebly platform, Fancybox, Slick Carousel, Animate.css, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
Weebly
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URLs)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal/expert blog focused on EU and NATO security issues
  2. Content includes multimedia (podcasts, videos), downloadable reports, and educational materials
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  4. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  6. Uses Weebly CMS and common web technologies
  7. Includes social media and external authoritative links
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the site
  9. No security headers or advanced security policies detected in provided data
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on the Weebly platform, leveraging a mature CMS with integrated hosting and CDN services. The technology stack includes legacy jQuery 1.8.3, Google Analytics, and common UI libraries like Fancybox and Slick Carousel. Performance is moderate, with good mobile responsiveness and SEO metadata in place. However, the use of older JavaScript libraries may pose security risks and technical debt. Accessibility is basic, suggesting potential improvements for compliance with standards such as WCAG. The site architecture is straightforward, focusing on content delivery with embedded multimedia and external links. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and enhance security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lelundin.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lelundin.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.