Skip to main content

Security report for lekta.ai

Contactis Group Sp. z o.o. · Technology · Poland

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lekta.ai is a Polish technology company specializing in conversational AI virtual agents designed to enhance customer care across multiple channels including voice and text. The company targets enterprises seeking scalable and secure AI solutions, with a business model focused on B2B technology provision. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear contact information and a focus on enterprise readiness. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as HTML5 video, Google Fonts, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking. Hosting appears to be supported by Google Cloud DNS infrastructure. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness but lacks advanced accessibility features. From a security perspective, the domain is registered consistently with the business entity and country. However, the website lacks published privacy and security policies, security headers, and incident response information, which are important for compliance and trust. DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a potential DNS security gap. User tracking is moderate due to Google Analytics usage, but privacy compliance is limited by the absence of a privacy policy. Overall, Lekta.ai presents a credible and professional business with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security posture. Strategic enhancements in policy publication, security headers, and DNS security would strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lekta.ai

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lekta.ai operates in the conversational AI technology sector, serving enterprise clients primarily in Europe. The company leverages its expertise to deliver virtual agents capable of handling multiple communication channels simultaneously, including call centers, websites, mobile apps, and social media messaging platforms. Its competitive advantage lies in its enterprise-ready, scalable, and secure AI solutions backed by proven implementations. The business model is focused on providing technology solutions rather than direct consumer services, targeting medium to large enterprises. The company is relatively young, founded in 2017, and maintains a consistent brand and domain registration aligned with its corporate identity. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data, suggesting a focused operational scope. Growth potential exists through expanding AI capabilities and compliance maturity.

Security posture

The current security posture of Lekta.ai is moderate. The domain is secured with clientTransferProhibited status, reducing risk of unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS queries to spoofing. The website lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are important to mitigate common web attacks. No privacy policy or terms of service are published, limiting GDPR compliance and user trust. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, reducing transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, which should be balanced with clear privacy disclosures. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and security readiness.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Contactis Group Sp. z o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Contactis Group Sp. z o.o.
Description
Virtual Agents that use Artificial Intelligence to make conversations more natural.
Key services
Conversational AI technology, Virtual agents for voice and text channels, Integration with call centers, websites, mobile apps, and Facebook Messenger
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Custom CSS, HTML5 video, Google Fonts (Rubik)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and consistent messaging
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service found, which is a compliance gap
  3. Cookie policy is present with consent mechanism
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with company domain email and phone number
  5. No security policy or incident response information published
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  7. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking
  8. No CMS detected; likely custom-built site
  9. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
  10. No security headers detected in provided data
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML5 and CSS, incorporating modern elements such as video backgrounds and Google Fonts for styling. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing analytics. Hosting is inferred to be on Google Cloud infrastructure based on DNS name servers. The site is mobile responsive and has clear navigation, but accessibility features are basic. No CMS or major frameworks were detected, indicating a custom or lightweight build. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt in security. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but could be improved with enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lekta.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lekta.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.