Skip to main content

Security report for leitstelle-nord.de

Kooperative Regionalleitstelle Nord · Government · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kooperative Regionalleitstelle Nord is a regional emergency coordination center serving the districts of Nordfriesland, Schleswig-Flensburg, and the city of Flensburg in Germany. Founded in 2009, it provides critical emergency dispatch and coordination services to local residents and emergency responders. The website reflects a government-oriented public service entity with a clear focus on regional emergency management. The organization maintains a consistent brand presence and provides clear contact information, including email, phone, and physical address, supporting its credibility and trustworthiness. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as Elementor and accessibility tools, with integration of Google Fonts and FontAwesome. It employs HTTPS for secure communication and uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking, although it lacks visible cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policy disclosures. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured data markup. From a security perspective, the site has a good SSL configuration but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS data is consistent with the organization's claims, showing domain registration since 2009, aligning with the founding date. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence for a government emergency coordination entity, with recommendations to improve privacy compliance and security header implementation to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leitstelle-nord.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Kooperative Regionalleitstelle Nord operates as a public sector emergency coordination center, focusing on regional emergency dispatch services. Its market position is that of a critical government service provider within northern Germany. The business model is service-oriented, funded and operated by regional authorities to support emergency response. The target customer segments include local residents, emergency services, and governmental agencies. The organization benefits from a stable partnership ecosystem with local government bodies and emergency responders. Growth indicators are not explicitly stated but the domain longevity and consistent branding suggest operational stability. The website does not indicate commercial revenue streams or affiliate partnerships, emphasizing its public service nature.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces its defense-in-depth posture. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness communication. Compliance with GDPR is not explicitly documented, and cookie consent mechanisms are missing despite the use of Google Analytics. No known vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public informational site but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, privacy disclosures, and incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to inform users about tracking and obtain consent.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including abuse@ or security@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kooperative Regionalleitstelle Nord
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kooperative Regionalleitstelle Nord
Description
Kooperative Regionalleitstelle für die Kreise Nordfriesland, Schleswig-Flensburg und die Stadt Flensburg.
Key services
Emergency dispatch coordination, Regional emergency management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Fonts, FontAwesome, Download Manager plugin, WP Accessibility plugin
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (WP Accessibility)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional emergency coordination center for northern Germany.
  2. Content is in German language and targeted at local residents and emergency services.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages were found.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  8. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  9. No adult or questionable content present.
  10. WHOIS data is consistent and domain age matches organizational history.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and uses several plugins including Download Manager and WP Accessibility. It loads external resources from Google Fonts and FontAwesome. The site is served over HTTPS with valid SSL configuration. Performance appears moderate with standard optimizations. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified but DNS uses UI-DNS name servers. There is no evidence of advanced caching or CDN usage in the provided data. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of privacy compliance mechanisms which could impact user trust and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leitstelle-nord.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leitstelle-nord.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.