Skip to main content

Security report for lectoraonline.com

eLearning Brothers · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lectora Online is a web-based eLearning authoring platform operated under the brand eLearning Brothers. The website offers a SaaS solution for creating and collaborating on training content, targeting corporate training teams and eLearning developers. The platform is positioned as a trusted and established tool in the eLearning industry, with a focus on ease of use and team collaboration. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS, uses modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery, and integrates Google Analytics and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, although explicit security headers and incident response policies are not published. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain www.lectoraonline.com raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be verified. Overall, the website is professional, privacy-conscious, and technically sound, but would benefit from improved transparency in domain registration and contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lectoraonline.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
45
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, specifically in eLearning software. It leverages a SaaS business model providing online authoring tools for training content creation. The target market includes corporate training departments and educational content creators. The company benefits from its association with eLearning Brothers, a known brand in the industry, which enhances market credibility. The website's integration with Google Analytics and Cookiebot indicates a mature approach to user data and marketing analytics. However, the lack of visible contact information and domain WHOIS data could impact trust with potential customers. The partnership ecosystem includes Cookiebot for privacy compliance and Cloudflare for hosting and security. Growth indicators are positive given the professional presentation and modern technology stack.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and a robust cookie consent mechanism that complies with GDPR. The use of Cookiebot allows users to granularly control cookie preferences, enhancing privacy compliance. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No security.txt or incident response contact information is published, which limits transparency in vulnerability disclosure and incident handling. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could be improved with additional security policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  2. Add standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer trust.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Consider publishing explicit privacy, security, and incident response policies on the website to demonstrate compliance and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eLearning Brothers
Description
Lectora, the Most Trusted Authoring Tool in the World. Easily create training and collaborate with your team anytime, anywhere. Try 30 days for free.
Key services
Online eLearning authoring, Team collaboration, Training content creation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Typekit Fonts (Adobe Fonts), Cloudflare (likely for CDN and security)
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Adobe Inc. tracking pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Adobe Inc. pixel trackers
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and user control.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the main page.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration or privacy issues.
  5. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond Cookiebot privacy link.
  6. No terms of service or incident response information found.
  7. Website is professionally designed and targeted at eLearning professionals.
  8. External links mostly to trusted domains and partners.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy management. Fonts are served via Adobe Typekit. Hosting and CDN services appear to be provided by Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized font loading. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected. The technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and improve contact and policy transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lectoraonline.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lectoraonline.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.